• @workerONEOP
    link
    -12
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    While taking King’s Pilot School class I was taught that Bernoulli’s Principal explains how planes generate lift. But a few months later I saw someone post online who said that it is actually debated whether this is true. I thought it was interesting and have been thinking about it lately. A little research found this article in Scientific American which describes the ongoing debate.

    And why do you have to be so rude?

    • @Vinny_93
      link
      3325 days ago

      I get annoyed at clickbait titles.

      It’s quite obvious Bernouilli’s theorem is largely correct, even though it does not cover the entirety of why air behaves like this.

      Planes stay in the air because of aerodynamic lift. Planes are designed around this principle and thousands of planes stay in the air because we know this is how it works.

      • @breadsmasher
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        To be clear I have no idea either way.

        Is this one of those “we know what the principle is (aerodynamic lift) and how to make it work but we don’t know why it works the way it does?”

        edit. ask question. receive downvotes. Hello reddit 2.0.

        • @Vinny_93
          link
          725 days ago

          No, we know why. There are just certain peculiarities that cannot be explained by the existing theories.

          • @asdfasdfasdf
            link
            1025 days ago

            Maybe I’m misunderstanding some nuance here but it sounds like you’re saying exactly what the person you replied to said.

        • @apfelwoiSchoppen
          link
          5
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          The article is much less about the principle, because even it says it is scientifically true. The focus of the article is “we can’t, like, explain it, man!” It’s a really long “how do magnets work” piece.