@jeffw to politics • 2 months agoExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square51arrow-up1556arrow-down18
arrow-up1548arrow-down1external-linkExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.com@jeffw to politics • 2 months agomessage-square51
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink44•2 months agoSo the republicans are so criminal we can’t investigate them because of optics. I hate the government. Top to bottom.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink21•edit-22 months agoIf optics and mob threats are why you cant investigate corruption then in a very real sense right wing terrorism is working on the government.
minus-square@Ensign_CrablinkEnglish15•2 months agoWe don’t negotiate with terrorists; we preemptively capitulate.
So the republicans are so criminal we can’t investigate them because of optics. I hate the government. Top to bottom.
If optics and mob threats are why you cant investigate corruption then in a very real sense right wing terrorism is working on the government.
We don’t negotiate with terrorists; we preemptively capitulate.
If money is speech, it becomes the ONLY speech.