A California-based startup called Savor has figured out a unique way to make a butter alternative that doesn’t involve livestock, plants, or even displacing land. Their butter is produced from synthetic fat made using carbon dioxide and hydrogen, and the best part is —- it tastes just like regular butter.

  • @mipadaitu
    link
    English
    321 month ago

    Interesting way to get fat alternatives, people are already used to eating fake butter regularly, so it probably wouldn’t take much to add this to our diet.

    • @disguy_ovaheaOP
      link
      491 month ago

      It’s also closer to butter than butter alternatives. It’s not made to be more healthy, just more planet friendly.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        -781 month ago

        Fake food is going to be more healthy than the real deal?

        Sure buddy

          • sunzu
            link
            fedilink
            -451 month ago

            It is also a fact that butter is a staple food that has been used for thousands of years with a proven track record.

              • sunzu
                link
                fedilink
                -401 month ago

                Just because something is fallacy the way it was presented does not make it wrong if he facts check out :)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  43
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Your facts don’t check out, that’s what makes you wrong. Fallacies are just the symptom.

                  • sunzu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -31
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Is butter not the best product in its class? both from health ie nutrition value and taste perspective?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              71 month ago

              This may be a logical fallacy known as false equivalence, when one fact is stated or implied to be conflated with another not directly related fact.

        • @Omega_Man
          link
          221 month ago

          They said it’s NOT made to be more healthy.

            • Fushuan [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              So is any meat, mayonnaise, even butter is processed. Ever went into a fast food chain? Most ingredients are processed to the bits.

              You better not take any medicine, that super processed? And Coca cola or any energy drinks? Bleh, made in labs!

              I guess you only eat whole grains collected by you, that must suck.

              • sunzu
                link
                fedilink
                01 month ago

                Dam y’all really getting bent on shape over this lol

        • @disguy_ovaheaOP
          link
          19
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I wrote it’s not made to be more healthy, because that’s the current marketing of butter alternatives. This isn’t claiming to be more healthy. The compounds are the same as the fatty acids in butter.

          It’s simply a way to get butter while reducing carbon dioxide, rather than increasing it.

        • Deebster
          link
          fedilink
          181 month ago

          If it’s chemically identical, what does it matter if it’s come from dairy, this process, or a Star Trek replicator?

        • @eatthecake
          link
          31 month ago

          It’s not made to be more healthy, just more planet friendly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 month ago

          Good or bad, it’s still processed food.

          That’s my half-assed neutral statement. I choose not to eat processed foods. As long as there’s disclosure, I don’t care.

          What people eat or don’t eat is their business.