The Democratic Socialists of America pulled its endorsement of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York this week, accusing the progressive congresswoman of being insufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause and efforts to end the war in Gaza…

Her approach has increasingly strained her relationship with some of the left’s most strident critics of Israel. When she rallied last month in the Bronx with Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Jamaal Bowman, dozens of pro-Palestinian demonstrators angry over her endorsement of Mr. Biden chanted “You’re a fraud, A.O.C.”

  • @HomerianSymphony
    link
    13
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Good. No compromise on genocide. Never again means never again.

    This gives me some hope for the DSA.

    And don’t come at me with “pragmatism”. The pragmatists supported the Nazis.

      • @LinkerbaanOP
        link
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The Ukraine war is a big source of actual leftie infighting. But DSA did not withdraw their endorsement on that. This is a strawman.

        Dems wanted lefties to compromise and they did. Then Dems want lefties to compromise some more.

        The Genocide in Gaza is not up to debate for any leftie. And Bernie and AOC have even promoted the Genocide at the start of it by refusing to call it a Genocide, and refusing to call for a ceasefire.

          • @jordanlundM
            link
            11 month ago

            Removed, misinformation.

            https://www.dsausa.org/statements/on-russias-invasion-of-ukraine/

            “This extreme and asymmetrical escalation is an illegal act under the United Nations Charter and severely threatens the livelihoods and well-being of working-class peoples in Ukraine, Russia, and across the region. We urge an immediate ceasefire and the total withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine.”

      • @TokenBoomer
        link
        01 month ago

        Source that they’re foreign assets?

        DSA is a membership-led and membership-funded organization, with the vast majority of our funding coming from membership dues. This guarantees that our resources come from our source of power: organized people. Our funding and our power are inextricably linked. Dues allow our organization to be accountable to our members and our members alone. source

        • @SleezyDizasta
          link
          11 month ago

          You could say the same exact thing about AIPAC. It’s also a membership-led and membership-funded organization where the vast majority of it’s funding coming from private donations… yet somehow I don’t think you’ll have the same reaction to them being foreign assets. The reality is that both of these organizations advance the interests of foreign governments over America’s, only difference is that Israel is a US ally and the countries that the DSA chooses to align itself with are American adversaries.

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            -11 month ago

            AIPAC lobby’s for Israel. What foreign government does the DSA lobby for?

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      -11 month ago

      Never again means never again.

      That’s a good way to describe how the DSA views political power.

    • @PugJesus
      link
      English
      -61 month ago

      Never again means never again.

      Apparently, to purists like you, “Never again” means “If it happens anywhere, we should help it happen everywhere we can.” But hey, who cares about minorities in the US, and Ukrainians in Ukraine? Fuck 'em, right?

      • @HomerianSymphony
        link
        51 month ago

        “Ugh, genocide is bad, but we have other things to worry about right now.”

        — You, and most Germans during World War II.

        • @0laura
          link
          61 month ago

          genuine question, what alternative is there to voting for whatever candidate the democrats run with?

          • comfy
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Serious replies:

            • Developing alternate forms of power to ‘vote once every four years’. Now, I realize it’s probably not the answer you’re looking for as obviously that won’t just happen in time for this election, but it’s necessary to understand the material power we hold as workers in society, unless you’re actually happy with whatever candidates the Democrats run with. There have been times where worker action hindered genocidal regimes and wars by cutting off supply and pressuring our governments into pulling support.

            • Pressuring the Democrats away from running certain candidates

            • Somehow making a third-party popular enough to threaten your local seat [probably not feasible for most seats?]

            • Somehow abolishing the broken FPTP voting system [probably not feasible?]

            • @0laura
              link
              61 month ago

              right but couldn’t you vote for the democrats and also do those things? it’s not really a one or the other kind of situation

              • comfy
                link
                fedilink
                21 month ago

                Definitely, and for most people (there are rare exceptions, like seats which aren’t just Dem vs. Rep as the only viable candidates) I’d assume it’s the pragmatic choice for now given the broken system.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 month ago

              Somehow abolishing the broken FPTP voting system [probably not feasible?]

              Not feasible? Then why do Alaska and Maine use something other then First Past The Post voting?

              How we vote is controlled at the state level, we can push through reform one state at a time!

              • comfy
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                My mistake, I heard about those but assumed it only applied for state-level politicians, not federal politicians they elect. Thanks for letting me know!

        • @PugJesus
          link
          English
          -10
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “Genocide is bad, but we have other things to worry about.” - Me, and the US offering vast amounts of Lend-Lease in WW2 to the Soviet Union despite their vast campaigns of ethnic cleansing.

          Apparently, by contrast, your position is “Genocide is bad, so we should do everything we can to lose to the Nazis, who will genocide far more people than the Soviet Union. That will really show the fascists! They’ll be SO mad when they herd us into the gas chambers lol!”