• @Snapz
    link
    314 months ago

    So it doesn’t actually work well when you say that the claim without source was debunked… And you also don’t provide source.

    Whatchoo talking about, bro?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      464 months ago

      The meme itself is not even a source.

      Like, me saying I had lunch with sasquatch is not something someone needs to rigorously debunk.

      • @yokonzoOP
        link
        English
        19
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I mean I get what you’re saying but… One is a hairy apeman people claim to see in the woods, the other is companies doing something unethical and shady to improve their bottom line which there is absolutely precedent for.

        Yeah it’s unlikely this story is real but your analogy makes no sense

          • @Lautaro
            link
            224 months ago

            Why? I believe you.

          • @Wogi
            link
            54 months ago

            I once had a train run on me by JP Morgan, Goldman and Sachs, and Blackrock.

            • @pyre
              link
              24 months ago

              there was probably some profit to be made, they’d totally do that. it’s not like they would be held accountable

        • @Wogi
          link
          54 months ago

          Both are things people will believe without evidence because they want to believe it.

          A hairy ape man in the woods is cool. Shitting on businesses is cool.

    • @frostysauce
      link
      74 months ago

      It’s a fucking meme, of course it doesn’t have a source. No one in their right mind would trust this as fact anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No one is claiming a meme needs a source. That reply said it was fake. Maybe true, but again provide a link if it is.