we appear to be the first to write up the outrage coherently too. much thanks to the illustrious @self

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Mistral’s Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 produced copyrighted content on 22% of the prompts.

    did you know that a lesser-known side effect of the infinite monkeys approach is that they will produce whole sections of copyright content abso-dupo-lutely by accident? wild, I know! totes coinkeedink!

    I’d be glad to provide it once you’ve come to your senses and want to discuss things like an adult

    jesus fucking christ you must be a fucking terrible person to work with

    I’ve seen toddlers throw more mature tantrums

    • Steve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      she wrote harry potter with an llm, didn’t she?

    • @Lumisal
      link
      English
      -72 months ago

      I’m too old to discuss against bad faith arguments.

      Especially with people who won’t read the information I provide them showing their initial information was wrong.

      One is a company that has something to sell, the other an article with citations showing why it’s not easy to determine what percentage of a data set is infringing on copyright, or whether exact reproduction via “fishing expedition” prompting is a useful metric to determine if unauthorized copyright was used in training.

      The dumbest take though is attacking Mistral of all LLMs, even though it’s on an Apache 2.0 license.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ve read the article you’ve posted: it does not refute the fucking datapoint provided, it literally DOES NOT EVEN MENTION MISTRAL AT ALL.

        so all I can tell you is to take your pearlclutching tantrum bullshit and please fuck off already

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 months ago

          god these weird little fuckers’ ability to fill a thread with garbage is fucking notable isn’t it? something about loving LLMs makes you act like an LLM. how depressing for them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 months ago
            • high willingness to accept painfully inexact responses
            • high tendency to side with authority when given no information
            • low ability to distinguish “how it is” from “how it seems like it should be”

            Meta:

            • default expectation that others are the same way
            • indignant consent-ignoring gesture if they’re not
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 months ago

            To think that when sneer club/techtakes migrated to lemmy, I was pretty sure we would not be getting a lot of incidental traffic to the communities. Just about as wrong as you can be.

          • Steve
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 months ago

            I bet they go to react conferences

        • @Lumisal
          link
          English
          -42 months ago

          Removed by mod

        • @Lumisal
          link
          English
          -52 months ago

          Removed by mod

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 months ago

            you should speak to a physicist, they might be able to find a way your density can contribute to science

          • Steve
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 months ago

            “exact percentage”

            just fuck right off. wasting my fucken time.

            • @Lumisal
              link
              English
              -42 months ago

              You’re the one who linked to an exact percentage, not me. Have a good day.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                102 months ago

                no, you utter fucking clown. they’re literally posting to take the piss out of you, the only person in the room who isn’t getting that everyone is laughing at them, not with them

                • @Lumisal
                  link
                  English
                  -32 months ago

                  Removed by mod

              • Steve
                link
                fedilink
                English
                82 months ago

                re-read your chatgpt response and think about whether the percentages in my original link could be too high or too low.

                • Steve
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  92 months ago

                  but, like, really think this time. at this point i’m not arguing with you, i’m trying to help you.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  92 months ago

                  too high or too low

                  trick question everyone knows this late on a friday you want a body high for that nice mellow low feeling