@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agoLinguisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square241fedilinkarrow-up11.33Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageLinguisticsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square241fedilink
minus-square@EtterralinkEnglish0•4 months agoIn a perfect world there would be one language that was absolutely precise and only added new worlds as necessary. We don’t live there though, so we’re stuck with our current insanity.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•4 months agoDifferent languages have unique world views and understandings. To have a single language is to eradicate a plethora of cultures… Nothing perfect about that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoWhat you’re describing sounds like Esperanto.
In a perfect world there would be one language that was absolutely precise and only added new worlds as necessary. We don’t live there though, so we’re stuck with our current insanity.
Different languages have unique world views and understandings.
To have a single language is to eradicate a plethora of cultures… Nothing perfect about that.
What you’re describing sounds like Esperanto.