• @adam_y
    link
    English
    152 months ago

    And their net contribution to human knowledge is…?

    • @rImITywR
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Matt Patt was consulted when evaluating possible outcomes of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

    • @dohpaz42
      link
      English
      -92 months ago

      Mmm-hmm.

      That is only one aspect of academia’s purpose.

      • @adam_y
        link
        English
        132 months ago

        Oh come on mate, I left an open goal for you there.

        You could have scored an easy one by saying that their understanding of economic factors in the new media landscape is a relatively new field for study.

        You could have talked about the aspects of social discourse and relationships between the maker and the viewer.

        Fuck, you could have even framed what they do as artistic expression

        But nope, you are too tied up in the misplaced metric of financial success.

        And here’s why lectures about that would be next to useless… Their experiences are not transferable. You can’t copy what they do and expect success. That’s because novelty is a factor and you cannot teach that.

        Compare that to the scientific method where everything relies on being exactly able to reproduce results.

        Sure, there are plenty of purposes for academia, but what you suggest really isn’t one of them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        It’s not. It’s the actual point of academia. It is the one thing you cannot remove and still have academia.