• @TrickDacy
    link
    -4
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So should we not make films that show how fucked up specific wars are?

    I think it’s probably pretty rare that the military leaders who executed the war operations also make the movies about them…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 month ago

      It would be better to have war crimes trials to show how fucked up specific wars are.

      Being able to make movies showcasing your past crimes is not a sign of a healthy society…

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        91 month ago

        Again, this is not the government typically making these movies. It’s artists which are horrified by war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        I think the point of these movies are to inform the public of the brutality of war, and how shitty our government can be. It’s purpose is to shine a light on it, which I do think is pretty useful. Otherwise, most of us may not have known about it, and would have a very different/heavily filtered view of our government.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Who is “we” and what are “our” goals? Those definitions will answer your question quickly enough.

      All movies that glorify military violence should be treated cautiously even if the overall message is anti-war. Take Apocalypse Now. What will some people remember? The helicopters, Wagner, napalm in the morning. That’s not saying there’s no value in such movies, though.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        31 month ago

        We: filmmakers

        Their goals: shine a light on how fucked war is. I cannot actually remember watching a war movie that didn’t make me deeply saddened by the brutality. Apocalypse now is a perfect example.