The former president and first lady threw their weight behind the presumptive Democratic nominee

Barack and Michelle Obama have endorsed Kamala Harris for the Democratic nomination for president, sharing the news in a joint phone call.

A video released by the campaign suggests the former president and first lady called Harris on Thursday while the vice president was in Houston, where she addressed the American Federation of Teachers and received a briefing on recovery efforts following Hurricane Beryl.

“We called to say, Michelle and I couldn’t be prouder to endorse you and do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office,” Barack Obama is heard telling Harris in a 55-second video of the call.

“This is going to be historic,” Michelle Obama tells Harris.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -264 months ago

    Don’t buy into any crap you see about her going forward. Eat no for breakfast.

    This is the exact attitude that led Republicans into being able to believe that Trump is an upright and moral citizen…

    No one should write a blank check of virtue for any politician. Valid criticism is important, without it we’re just going to be led around by the nose by those who have access to power.

    If we don’t hold liberal politicians to the same standards we utilize for conservatives, then we will end up with the same type of shit bags they have.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is the exact attitude that led Republicans into being able to believe that Trump is an upright and moral citizen…

      No, not even close to the same thing.

      Maybe you’re too young to remember, but Trump has a very long history of being a massive, racist, piece of shit. He is literally the archetype of nearly every movie and cartoon villain in the 90s (not even kidding, Some More News did a whole video on it, it’s actually insane).

      He was notorious for not paying his contractors, and instead telling them to sue him, knowing there was no way they could afford to win a case against him.

      He was notorious for blatantly racist housing policies at his properties.

      He was notorious for taking out a full page ad in the New York Times basically saying we should still kill the (recently found innocent) Central Park Five regardless of their guilt (guess their skin color).

      You can’t even make this comparison, it’s absurd.

      • @chiliedogg
        link
        224 months ago

        His first time making national news was when the Justice Department went after him in 1973 for violating the Fair Housing Act.

        Black applicants for apartments in his buildings had the letter “C” (for “colored”) added to their applications and were denied based entirely on their race.

        For over 50 years he’s demonstrated time and again that he’s a racist piece of shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -24 months ago

        Yes, and conservatives choose not to criticize him for being a shit head. My point is that it is the people’s job to hold their elected officials to a higher standard, and we do that with valid criticism.

        • @ripcord
          link
          84 months ago

          They were talking about aggressive disinformation, not avoiding accountability.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            It seems a lot of people here are conflating any criticism with disinformation. If you mention the war in Palestine people automatically roll their eyes.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      154 months ago

      There is a biiiig difference in the timing and source of the news. And especially in the short term every new bit of news about her should at least be treated as suspect.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -194 months ago

        No news should be taken at face value in the modern era, that doesn’t mean we can just tell people to just say no to any criticism about her.

        For example… I don’t appreciate her little memo equating protesting a genocide to antisemitism. Is the memo she posted from her personal Twitter account just fake news?

        • @Maggoty
          link
          104 months ago

          The problem is there was Pro Hamas stuff at the protest. They have the pictures. Which pretty neatly traps most politicians into having to disavow it because Hamas does horrific shit too. Seeing those pictures, her statement absolutely tracks as correct.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -114 months ago

            You do realize you are utilizing the “both sides” argument about a genocide?

            The IDF has killed several times more civilians than Hamas and were still okay associating with them…

            • @Maggoty
              link
              14 months ago

              I should have been more clear. I’m talking about what politicians are forced into doing. Not my personal views. We’ve spent 20 years demonizing the “terrorists”. Israel very successfully labeled all Palestinians as terrorists until very recently. Getting Americans to understand that the entire time we’ve supported Israel they’ve been doing 10 times worse to the Palestinians is going to take another big push. Understanding Hamas as an embattled resistance movement is a step too far for most voters right now.

              So showing up with actual Hamas iconography and flags pretty much requires a statement like this.

              • RubberDuck
                link
                14 months ago

                Hamas cannot be rebranded like that because that is also not true. They are terrorists.

                It would be good to stop with the unconditional support of the IDF because they are an extension of a radicalized government that has settler extremists in it.

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  14 months ago

                  So were the IRA under modern standards. So was the French Resistance. So are the Ukrainian stay behind units. So were the American minutemen.

                  The idea of terrorism being any one that harms civilians for political or religious gain is breathtakingly broad. For example the Taliban had far more in common with the French Resistance than they did with Al Qaeda.

                  When I said we’ve had 20 years of labeling people “Terrorists”, there’s a reason that’s in quote marks. It’s basically turned into anyone we don’t approve of is a terrorist and anyone we do approve of is targeting key government infrastructure in a wartime environment. Which is a really neat way to ignore all of the actual issues and push a conflict into genocide because you’ve made peace impossible any other way.

                  Over and over again you find these terrorist groups that are confined to one region or country are actually political entities operating on the same resistance model as the old IRA. Right down to the messaging about generational conflict.

                  And yes I realize this is incredibly intersectional and isn’t something most people are going to realize without a college level political education in conflict or two more large social movements. (One to lay the groundwork, and another to apply it to the region.)

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    14 months ago

                    Nah it’s been fairly consistent that groups that use violence against civilian targets to gain political influence are labelled terrorists. What’s not been consistent is your personal sympathies towards people that use these tactics.

                    Which is a really neat way to ignore all of the actual issues and push a conflict into genocide because you’ve made peace impossible any other way.

                    That’s bullshit. People can always negotiate, if they choose leaders that are capable of negotiating in good faith.

                  • RubberDuck
                    link
                    14 months ago

                    I love how with the closing paragraph you directly call everyone plebs if they don’t see it your way.

                    Yes the conflict is more nuanced but I don’t agree to the equivalencies you make with several other organizations. Groups founded for terror might eveolve to do more, but in the case of Hamas that is just to nurture their human shields and keep them alive enough to Garner outrage when they get bombed.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              04 months ago

              It’s you trying to both sides Genocide. Hamas committed genocide on October 7. You’re trying to normalize it by claiming Israel is also committing genocide.

              It’s not a numbers game. Israel is conducting a war with the goal to bring back the people Hamas is holding hostage (which is a war crime BTW). Hamas attacked Israelis on October 7 with the goal to kill as many people as they can.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Hamas committed genocide on October 7.

                Lol, my dude. An act of terrorism is not the same as a genocide.

                You’re trying to normalize it by claiming Israel is also committing genocide.

                I’m pretty sure it’s not just me who thinks that, the ICC has warrants out for Bibis arrest.

                It’s not a numbers game. Israel is conducting a war with the goal to bring back the people Hamas is holding hostage (which is a war crime BTW).

                Yeah… That’s why they’ve primarily killed women and children? Also, genocide is most definitely a numbers game.

                Hamas attacked Israelis on October 7 with the goal to kill as many people as they can.

                And that was a bad thing… Right? So doing the same back, but killing several times more civilians is worse…right?

        • RubberDuck
          link
          94 months ago

          Ah… one of those. Got it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -104 months ago

            Lol, yes the appropriate response to valid criticism…ignore it.

            If you don’t agree with how Israel and America are treating Palestinians, whats the chance anyone is going to change their stance if you don’t even do the bare minimum of criticism?

            I’m not telling people to not vote, or to vote for fucking Trump, I’m just saying there are plenty of things we should be doing better, and we should all be voicing that.

            • RubberDuck
              link
              64 months ago

              Just really really tiresome that the middle east drama is always injected. We know, it’s a horror show.

              Now the first and most important thing is preventing don snorleone from taking the White House. Because if you think Biden is bad for the conflict there, I have a bridge I want to sell you.

    • Doom
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      No. No no no.

      I swear nobody remembers the days we all knew he was shit, watch back the future there is literally a parody of what everyone knew Trump was.

    • @leadore
      link
      10
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Oh good grief, don’t put words in my mouth. That’s not what I said and you know it. I said don’t buy the crap that we’re about to be flooded with. I never said you can’t criticize her. You can believe and criticize any valid reality-based you want to, but check the facts first.

    • @Fedizen
      link
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      just be skeptical of any claims made by the lunatic contingent that hates women and democrats.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        That’s fair, but people aren’t stopping there. Mention any criticism from a leftist perspective and you get the same treatment.