@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • edit-26 months agoThe bizarre secrets I found investigating corrupt Winamp skinsjordaneldredge.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1755arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1750arrow-down1external-linkThe bizarre secrets I found investigating corrupt Winamp skinsjordaneldredge.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • edit-26 months agomessage-square90fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoMy man, I think I have over a hundred tabs and saved wikipedia articles alone that I always refer to when needed. The app works great for me
minus-square@PlopplinkEnglish5•6 months agoI would assume, and hope, it works really well for such usage. I only tend to end up on Wikipedia a couple of times a week, and 95% of that is on my desktop to have a quick look at something I won’t be getting back to ever again.
minus-squareVictorlinkEnglish2•6 months agoTime? Pff, no clue. But I look things up all the time and don’t have time to finish articles the first time round, ever (two kids under six). So it’s great to have and get back to articles.
There’s a Wikipedia app? I find that baffling.
Try it. It’s great.
How much time do you spend on Wikipedia?
My man, I think I have over a hundred tabs and saved wikipedia articles alone that I always refer to when needed. The app works great for me
I would assume, and hope, it works really well for such usage. I only tend to end up on Wikipedia a couple of times a week, and 95% of that is on my desktop to have a quick look at something I won’t be getting back to ever again.
Then the app is not for you. 😊
Time? Pff, no clue. But I look things up all the time and don’t have time to finish articles the first time round, ever (two kids under six).
So it’s great to have and get back to articles.