@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agoT. rexmander.xyzimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1208arrow-down17
arrow-up1201arrow-down1imageT. rexmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish60•edit-25 months agoI came to the comments looking for context, but since nobody has provided it yet, did some googling. I believe this is the reference: https://news.sky.com/story/tyrannosaurus-rex-could-have-been-even-bigger-than-previously-thought-study-suggests-13184470
minus-square@saltesclinkEnglish11•5 months ago may have weighed roughly 15 tonnes instead of 8.8, and measured 15 metres instead of 12. I find that very hard to believe for a bipedal land animal. Hit age 3 and your knees and hips are just done.
minus-square@Lommy241linkEnglish20•5 months agoGlad to see I wasn’t the only one who couldn’t understand this. Was worried I had a stroke.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•5 months agoMaybe they’re saying we don’t really know how big or small they got.
I’m going to need context here
I came to the comments looking for context, but since nobody has provided it yet, did some googling. I believe this is the reference: https://news.sky.com/story/tyrannosaurus-rex-could-have-been-even-bigger-than-previously-thought-study-suggests-13184470
I find that very hard to believe for a bipedal land animal. Hit age 3 and your knees and hips are just done.
Glad to see I wasn’t the only one who couldn’t understand this. Was worried I had a stroke.
Maybe they’re saying we don’t really know how big or small they got.