• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    614 months ago

    Don’t worry, the supreme court will soon reinterpret it to mean something completely different.

    • worldwidewave
      link
      314 months ago

      Thomas: “The founding fathers clearly indicated that they wanted some light molestation between the states, as women were property back then. This is no different from inspecting wheat when it enters the country.”

    • @N1ghtstalk3r
      link
      114 months ago

      Gotta love the Supreme Court nowadays… if you want to change the rules just cozy up to them and ask them to do it for you.

      • the post of tom joad
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        Wish i could be rich enough to be a branch of govt.

        We need some guys in there thatll take a bag of weed and some buttons or I’ll never get to participate in democracy

    • @barsquid
      link
      84 months ago

      Yes. The text says one thing, but what did the founders intend? Surely not the literal words. Only Clarence and pals will know after a seance. The first part of the ritual is, of course, receiving millions of dollars from billionaires.

    • @CharlesDarwin
      link
      English
      14 months ago

      Yeah, the “originalist” council of clerics on the “supreme” court have special insights into such things.