• @zazo
    link
    781 month ago

    memes aside it does look pretty neat - simple .apk installs, yaml system configs, automatic boot rollback, easy multi-gpu support - all solid user focused features - will have to see how it develops but so far it seems like a better alternative to the likes of PopOS

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 month ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s “better,” but merely different. Until immutable distros can easily solve installing certain software that requires system-level access (like VPN clients without a Linux package or repo), there will always be a place for mutable distros.

      And I say that as a proponent of distros like NixOS, Bazzite, and blendOS.

      • @asap
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        I’m running ProtonVPN on Bluefin from a flatpak with zero issues.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          Yep, and it’s one of the only VPNs with a flatpak. It works great when the software can be easily layered. Meanwhile, Private Internet Access comes as a .run executable tarball.

          • @asap
            link
            English
            71 month ago

            Until immutable distros can easily solve installing certain software

            So… it’s easily solved then?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              Not currently. Unless you have a good guide on how to build a flatpak that has more examples than launching a “Hello world” bash script.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 month ago

        You can do that with fedora Atomic tho, just enable it, also why install a VPN? Why you can’t use OpenVPN?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 month ago

          I can, actually, but I’d rather use WireGuard for the improved throughput. There’s no “enabling” Private Internet Access’s client, though, because it’s a self-executing tarball and install script, and that’s the only way to access their WG endpoints.

          They have a manual connection client through the command line, but that hasn’t been updated in over two years, and I don’t feel comfortable using it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        I haven’t used it myself, but from what I’ve read VanillaOS has that covered pretty well with APX?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          I haven’t really looked at that one, so I’ll have to take a look and see what it can do (and what its limitations are). I saw that it containerizes software by default, and something like VPN software can’t usually run in a simple container, since it usually tries to manage network connections, and would need unique permissions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            AFAIK it’s based on Distrobox, which allows you to work in containers with access to key host services that you need, which I think should be sufficient for a VPN.

            (In fact, for VPNs specifically Flatpaks are sufficient as well - I’m using Mozilla VPN via a Flatpak.)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              Private Internet Access doesn’t come as a flatpak, deb, or rpm, unfortunately. I’d have to build my own and come up with a way to automatically build it so I don’t have to manually do it each time PIA releases a new update.

              Podman containers via distrobox don’t work well for PIA, for whatever reason, so if I decide to pursue that, I’ll likely have to learn podman. I’m currently trying to install PIA during the build process of a custom uBlue image, and that has its own challenges.

              Basically, PIA is making me consider switching to another provider just to be done with it. 😅