• ditty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This, and we need to reincorporate female trees in urban areas to reduce the rampant pollen pollution caused by exclusively using male trees 🤧

    • @SchmidtGenetics
      link
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The cleanup cost from the fruit is what’s prohibitive about that, leaving the fruit isn’t an option since it makes the sidewalks unusable from the mess, it rots and creates mold spores, pests, rodents, etc, they all thrive.

      Theres a very good argument to why they shouldn’t introduce females everywhere.

      And how’s the males supposed to know if they are pollinating something or not for that matter? It would be less trees making pollen, but there will still be pollen.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        212 months ago

        Also, letting the homeless and working class forage for the fruit would be way too egalitarian and compassionate. Totally unacceptable!

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          English
          112 months ago

          Ideally the homeless wouldn’t exist in this scenario, and sure, the public can grab the bottom 8’? The public really can’t be trusted to safely use ladders, so that options right out.

          I’m all for it, but realistically it’s not a feasible solution? It’s to costly, wheter it be to collect it and give to public safely, or to provide ladders and medical care for the people who inevitably fall.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            6
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            My area has an entire non-profit org devoted to urban foraging, so maybe my perspective on its feasibility is a little different.

            https://concrete-jungle.org/

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              … a non profit relies on donations, needs volounteers, or other source of income, so it’s either paid through taxes like I mentioned, or through money in the end anyways…?

              Sure I guess that works? Whatever makes you feel better, but it’s still the same scenario in the end.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I mean they’re harvesting food I bet sales can cover ladders and fuel and whatnot. If you’re short on workers ask literally any other non-profit if they wouldn’t like half a ton of apples to make pie with for one of their projects, you’ll get your workers. Have a general “pluck two get one” policy provided they’re not selling the stuff, no other questions asked.

                Basically all that’s necessary is to have someone responsible for organising things, the economics are trivial as we’re literally talking about distributing stuff for free.

        • em2
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          Free food that drops out of the trees? Get the fuck outta here.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            Wow, that’s some real bullshit spin. I’m almost impressed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        News to me too… And I think it might be wrong but I don’t know enough to say with confidence.

        how I thought it works is that trees have male and female parts, but a single tree can have both parts. And some trees can self-pollinate.

        My uneducated guess is that it depends on the species, some are sexed and some are hermaphrodite. That’s how it goes in the animal kingdom.