• @General_Effort
    link
    English
    02 months ago

    That’s not the legal situation in the US. I don’t think this rather conservative take can be considered a global standard.

    • @NeoNachtwaechter
      link
      English
      -22 months ago

      That’s not the legal situation in the US.

      That’s right. In Usa they have a rather poor understanding of human rights (and maybe even less acceptance)

      • @General_Effort
        link
        English
        02 months ago

        Funny. It’s usually the US that’s considered ultra-capitalist. The right to free expression is globally recognized. The idea that everything should be capital, generating rents for the rich, not so much.

        • @NeoNachtwaechter
          link
          English
          -12 months ago

          I don’t know why you are talking about capital here. It is not about capital at all when we talk about human rights.

          The right to free expression is globally recognized

          That’s the one that is a little over-emphasized in Usa :) even though it is not the most important one. You should start to read about all the others as well.

          • @General_Effort
            link
            English
            -12 months ago

            In economics, capital goods or capital are “those durable produced goods that are in turn used as productive inputs for further production” of goods and services. […] Capital goods can also be immaterial, when they take the form of intellectual property. Many production processes require the intellectual property to (legally) produce their products. (From Wikipedia)

            The bill in OP is about turning a person’s likeness into capital. It will allow famous people to extract a rent from society. IE get free money at the expense of everyone else.

            You should start to read about all the others as well.

            I have. You haven’t. You’re an absolute tool.