• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    165 months ago

    Man the english language makes no sense.

    the sound in lose is the same sound as we are taught “oo” makes.

    Couldn’t a more straightforward language be chosen as the global one ffs

    • Flying Squid
      link
      115 months ago

      My father (who had a PhD in English) used to tell me that “ghoti” was pronounced “fish”

      GH as in rouGH
      O as in wOmen
      TI as in raTIon

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        How do you pronounce women? When I put those sounds together it makes more of a fush or fosh than fish .

        Or do you say fish different than me?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          115 months ago

          “Wih-men.” I think you’re thinking of woman, the singular version of the word.

      • Dr. Bluefall
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        That isn’t really consistent with English orthography.

        But you can write “pfysche”, and that would be consistent with English.

    • @Nutteman
      link
      55 months ago

      Looks like we can thank the Dutch language for that one

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        65 months ago

        Looks like loose is from Germanic/Old Norse, “laus”

        And lose is from Old English, “los”

        Also looks like I can’t stand to look at either of these words for a few day now.

        • @Nutteman
          link
          25 months ago

          From my tiny amount of research eventually it passed through the Dutch layer and ended up as “loose” from those origin points before being adopted into english

    • @vxx
      link
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There’s also loose and they sound the same but mean different things.

      Loose is when your pants is too wide.

      Lose is when the pants were so wide that you lost them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Lucy’s loose legwear lost latitude, leisurely lowering, leaving Lucy’s legs largely liberated. Lamentably, Lucy’s lost leggings landed listlessly, loitering lifelessly.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

        Man looking a thesaurus is fun Lol

      • @MutilationWave
        link
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        They don’t sound the same at all though.

        Lose - looze

        Loose - luice

        • @vxx
          link
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Interesting, I didn’t know that. FYI, there’s the phonetic transcription that saves us from using other words to describe a pronunciation.

          luːz - lose

          luːs - loose

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        I think they sound different, loose ends with a curt “s” sound, while lose ends with a longer “z” sound.

        • Jojo, Lady of the West
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Ooh, also its accent, this is not a thing couplet for me

          Discount, viscount, load and broad,
          Toward, to forward, to reward,

          Nor it’s immediate predecessor,

          Banquet is not nearly parquet,
          Which exactly rhymes with khaki.

          Parquet isn’t in my vocabulary, but doesn’t seem to rhyme with khaki in any common dialect either way.