Gone is the bullhorn. Instead, New York City emergency management officials have turned high-tech, using drones to warn residents about potential threatening weather.

With a buzzing sound in the background, a drone equipped with a loudspeaker flies over homes warning people who live in basement or ground-floor apartments about impending heavy rains.

“Be prepared to leave your location,” said the voice from the sky in footage released Tuesday by the city’s emergency management agency. “If flooding occurs, do not hesitate.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 month ago

    Is the existing emergency alert system not sufficient? It already activates TV, radio, and cell phones.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      221 month ago

      Not to mention, what’s wrong with plain old sirens on poles? I refuse to believe that drones are somehow cheaper to buy/operate/maintain.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        321 month ago

        what’s wrong with plain old sirens on poles?

        No cameras on them and they don’t normalize the idea of police drones buzzing around your neighborhood.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          151 month ago

          That is a very good point.

      • @Today
        link
        31 month ago

        In Dallas, our sirens don’t mean tornado; they mean go indoors to avoid large hail or high winds. It’s crazy confusing for people who don’t know, go hide in their bathrooms, and then get pissed off when there’s no tornado. An alternate/backup method would be good (voice or different siren?) but I’m not sure a drone can tolerate a severe weather situation.

      • finley
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        because if you set off a siren like that, all of the Orthodox Jews will assume its the Sabbath and run home.

        see, they already do this every Friday just before sundown to mark the beginning of the Sabbath, so…

        edit: this may just be limited to Williamsburg/Bed-Stuy

    • @ChocoboRocket
      link
      91 month ago

      My tinfoil hat theory is that Drones are far better at mass surveillance than current emergency alert systems, so while the advantage over the existing emergency alert system is probably negligible - it opens the door for people accepting having drones everywhere and constantly overhead which is the real goal.

      For a second layer of tinfoil, having a strong drone presence (production, infrastructure, technology) in the economy seems like it will be very useful for future wars. Whoever has the largest and smartest swarm wins

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        For slightly less tinfoil haberdashery, it could be used to more rapidly locate people during a weather disaster, identify what areas are most heavily impacted in real-time, and redirect emergency services in case of, say, debris blocking a road.

        This is of course assuming it’s not the cheapest shit the highest bidder offers (which it probably will be) that disintegrates during a light rain.

    • @Bonesince1997
      link
      41 month ago

      No. You need the government flying machines outside your window to let you know about your freedoms.

    • ggppjj
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      We can assume an amount of people in NYC that have no access to any of those.

      It’s not a bad supplement to existing systems.