Do they set up the whole thing to be destroyed so it would take years or longer to repair and use that as a threat against Russia attempting to take it back?
Except those gas pipes already go through Ukraine so if they wanted to threaten cutting the gas supply they could just cut the lines deep in their own territory.
Fact is, Ukraine understands that destabilising Europe by causing a gas shortage, while hitting Russias wallet, would make it much harder for European politicians supporting Ukraine to stay in power. They’re smart. They can see that their European allies are helping as much as they can, while still remaining popular enough at home to be able to keep up the assistance long term.
Taunt the Rus to try to take it back. Butcher the meat wave that tries. Become a persistent and stubborn threat, undermining Russian sovereignty, internal political stability by just hanging out in Russia without permission.
Is there any way to divert the fuel to be used in Ukraine?
The Gas Transmission System Operator of Ukraine recently reported that the transit of Russian through the Ukrainian gas transportation system is currently operating as usual.
Huh, so even with Russia having invaded Ukraine, Ukraine is still allowing Russian gas to flow through Ukraine to the EU? Must be in order to not upset the EU countries that are still getting Russian gas piped to them?
Ya, the situation is weird, ukraine has a contract until the end of 2024 of 2025 and they’ve been upholding it so far, but the agreement is with Russia not the EU…
Now that most of the EU has other sources though, maybe it’s time to just shut it off.
Oh sure, the contract is with Russia, but there’s got to be at least one EU state that is still dependent on Russian gas that UA needs continuing support from. Otherwise, it’s a no brainer to just take what Russian gas you can before they shut off the tap.
but there’s got to be at least one EU state that is still dependent on Russian gas
Plenty of them. Altough the things have changed quite quickly at some point pretty much the whole Europe relied on (cheap) Russian gas. EU states have largely switched to other supplies, but I think at least some of France and a ton of smaller non-EU countries still rely on the pipeline so shutting it down would cause a ton of issues across the continent which in turn would harm Ukraine as they’d be the ‘bad guy’ for your Joe Average in Austria (or somewhere else) who would at least pay more for his gas.
Additionally there’s the PR value when Ukraine can say ‘we honor our agreements, no matter what’ but I can’t say how much that plays a part on anything. Plus, I suppose, they collect some rent for the pipeline going trough their country, so keeping it running has financial reasons too.
It’s a pretty complex situation, but as Ukraine could pretty literally just crimp the whole pipeline with an excavator on their own land or pull the gas from the line for their own needs and haven’t done so, it tells to me that it’s more beneficial for them to keep it running.
It is the type of infrastructure Russia can not just bomb or shell. That makes it a good defensive position.
Other then that the pipelines continue to Europe via Ukraine. So shutting it down was easy to do for Ukraine before the war. However Ukraine has no interesst in destroying that pipeline as Ukraine has gas reserves in the regions of Ukraine Russia is currently occupying. Having a pipeline to Europe is usefull to transport that gas as well. So Ukraine does not care that much about blowing it up. Obviously if they do, the Russians have no problem shelling them, so they will not do that.
Btw it currently looks like Ukraine is moving to the Kursk nuclear power plant. That has a similar maybe even worse problem for Russia. Especially since two of the reactors are of the same type, which blew up in Chornobyl. Intresstingly there is a cut power line going from the power plant to Ukraine. Having 3GW of unbombable nuclear would be very nice for Ukraine.
So now that they have it, what does that mean?
Do they set up the whole thing to be destroyed so it would take years or longer to repair and use that as a threat against Russia attempting to take it back?
And then use that as leverage moving forward?
If they wanted to destroy it, they could have done so with artillery at any time since the Russians were pushed back from Kharkiv.
So if they aren’t going to leverage destroying it, what do you think they can get from it?
Ukraine: [looks at the completely open valves pumping gas full rate to Europe] “Can we launch long range strikes into Russia”
Europe: “No, we don’t want to upset the orcs”
Ukraine: [turns the valve once] “are you sure?..”
Europe: [sweating intensifies]
LOL, okay that does make sense.
Except those gas pipes already go through Ukraine so if they wanted to threaten cutting the gas supply they could just cut the lines deep in their own territory.
Fact is, Ukraine understands that destabilising Europe by causing a gas shortage, while hitting Russias wallet, would make it much harder for European politicians supporting Ukraine to stay in power. They’re smart. They can see that their European allies are helping as much as they can, while still remaining popular enough at home to be able to keep up the assistance long term.
Or they will just go " hey, our gas now. All yours Europe, thanks for the support"
That would be nice, but Europe would not accept it in fear of angering Putin
I have absolutely no clue. I suspect that capturing it was incidental. (It happened to be where they were going.)
Taunt the Rus to try to take it back. Butcher the meat wave that tries. Become a persistent and stubborn threat, undermining Russian sovereignty, internal political stability by just hanging out in Russia without permission.
Is there any way to divert the fuel to be used in Ukraine?
Huh, so even with Russia having invaded Ukraine, Ukraine is still allowing Russian gas to flow through Ukraine to the EU? Must be in order to not upset the EU countries that are still getting Russian gas piped to them?
Oh that’s interesting. I bet there’s a way to get fuel out from there and you could start collecting it and sending it back.
Check my edit above, weird situation.
Ya, the situation is weird, ukraine has a contract until the end of 2024 of 2025 and they’ve been upholding it so far, but the agreement is with Russia not the EU…
Now that most of the EU has other sources though, maybe it’s time to just shut it off.
Oh sure, the contract is with Russia, but there’s got to be at least one EU state that is still dependent on Russian gas that UA needs continuing support from. Otherwise, it’s a no brainer to just take what Russian gas you can before they shut off the tap.
Plenty of them. Altough the things have changed quite quickly at some point pretty much the whole Europe relied on (cheap) Russian gas. EU states have largely switched to other supplies, but I think at least some of France and a ton of smaller non-EU countries still rely on the pipeline so shutting it down would cause a ton of issues across the continent which in turn would harm Ukraine as they’d be the ‘bad guy’ for your Joe Average in Austria (or somewhere else) who would at least pay more for his gas.
Additionally there’s the PR value when Ukraine can say ‘we honor our agreements, no matter what’ but I can’t say how much that plays a part on anything. Plus, I suppose, they collect some rent for the pipeline going trough their country, so keeping it running has financial reasons too.
It’s a pretty complex situation, but as Ukraine could pretty literally just crimp the whole pipeline with an excavator on their own land or pull the gas from the line for their own needs and haven’t done so, it tells to me that it’s more beneficial for them to keep it running.
Well they could blow it up and stop some gas flows into EU
They could, but they lose it as leverage if they do.
If you can leverage something you’re likely to get more out of it.
Blowing it up should be the last thing they do if they don’t think they can keep control of it.
That would upset Europe, which is the second greatest arms donor to Ukraine after Russia.
It is the type of infrastructure Russia can not just bomb or shell. That makes it a good defensive position.
Other then that the pipelines continue to Europe via Ukraine. So shutting it down was easy to do for Ukraine before the war. However Ukraine has no interesst in destroying that pipeline as Ukraine has gas reserves in the regions of Ukraine Russia is currently occupying. Having a pipeline to Europe is usefull to transport that gas as well. So Ukraine does not care that much about blowing it up. Obviously if they do, the Russians have no problem shelling them, so they will not do that.
Btw it currently looks like Ukraine is moving to the Kursk nuclear power plant. That has a similar maybe even worse problem for Russia. Especially since two of the reactors are of the same type, which blew up in Chornobyl. Intresstingly there is a cut power line going from the power plant to Ukraine. Having 3GW of unbombable nuclear would be very nice for Ukraine.
well the man in the picture is clearly turning it off