• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    There’s a maximum liability limit in each policy. No matter what, that’s what that’s the maximum the insurance company is going to pay. Given that the full blow up of one tower already got to that limit, the towers owners claimed that each tower had a different claim, so the maximum liability of one, does not affect the other, but the judge disagree, said that both towers were affected by the same attack and share the same maximum liability.

    • @FlexibleToast
      link
      11 month ago

      I knew there was some way the insurance company was weaseling out of paying.