• Stern
    link
    7529 days ago

    I mean, apart from the archaeologist part that seems pretty sane to me to ask if you’re an atheist or at least a skeptic.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis 4&version=NIV

    Adam and Eve have two kids, Cain and Abel.

    Cain kills Abel (8). Cain gets cursed. (11) Cain is afraid he’ll be killed by… ??? (14). God is all, nah fam karma mark lmao. (15) Cain goes and lives in the land of Nod. (16) Cain, one of three living humans at this point, makes love to his wife, who randomly now exists, and births a son, Enoch. Cain also builds a city… for the now five people who live on Earth. (17).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2329 days ago

      It does actually say that Adam and eve had other sos and daughters. The assumption is from one of them.

    • @meco03211
      link
      2029 days ago

      Apparently the biblical explanation is that it’s a sister of Cain. Maybe the daughters births didn’t warrant an extra line in the Bible? It probably doesn’t keep a record of when Adam and Eve acquire new property as that’s mostly what women were considered.

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        5429 days ago

        From the Creation Museum. Directly from their website, so they’re proud of this:

        Number six is my favorite. “Because God said incest was okay back then and who are you to judge?”

        • @chemical_cutthroat
          link
          3629 days ago

          They really said that genetic disease is an accumulation of sin. Like someone is born with Downs Syndrome because their grandmother cheats at rummy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1529 days ago

          No one commented on “get his wife”? I assume a bride mail order catalog? They must have existed back then.

          • I Cast Fist
            link
            fedilink
            328 days ago

            Around that time, in that region, it was more often a trade, gimme something and get my property (daughter).

        • @trxxruraxvr
          link
          1429 days ago

          6 sounds more like “if you want to allow gay marriage you better shut up about incest”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1329 days ago

          Oh my parts 3 and 4 they’re so close to figuring out what the Darwin guy was talking about

        • @reddig33
          link
          10
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Not sure I would trust anything from the creation museum to be actually biblical.

          I know there’s an ancient myth about Adam having a first wife before Eve — there’s probably also other myths that fill in the blanks. There’s also nothing stopping God from making more people during this period like he made Adam and Eve. They were probably just the “first batch” so to speak.

              • JackbyDev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                228 days ago

                The serpent was actually Sir Pentious, believe it or not.

            • @raspberriesareyummy
              link
              629 days ago

              TIL. Lilith sounds way more fun & attractive than boring compliant Eve

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                429 days ago

                The story of Lilith has certainly been an inspiration to a lot of writers.

                But I suppose so has Eve being tempted by the fruit.

            • I Cast Fist
              link
              fedilink
              328 days ago

              Adding a bit to that, it’s very likely that the old judaic religion was polytheistic like every other in the nearby region (assyrians, babylonians, egyptians, hittites), but started to consolidate around a single deity (not clear when, the tradition was oral). That meant some stories were left out for whatever reason, others changed, as they did several times over the centuries before being written, and every other god of their pantheon became yaweh, which explains why he has such drastically different personalities in the bible

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            328 days ago

            Also, at some point any creation story is going to have to stop specifying literally every single thing that happened and start to hit broad strokes. Things like “we just didn’t explicitly mention every single kid she had” is probably the easiest explanation.

          • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
            link
            127 days ago

            They were probably just the “first batch” so to speak.

            the standard response to this is that if there were other independently created people in Eden then they wouldn’t have been expelled for Adam and Eve’s mistake. and after the fall no other people could be created because a) they would be sinless which messes everything up and b) “God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th”.

        • @meco03211
          link
          929 days ago

          I loved their explanation regarding building the Ark authentically when Noah lived to be over 900 years old. It’s simple really. He built it when he was like 300. You see it makes perfect sense. Next question.

        • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
          link
          227 days ago

          nice little dig at evolution calling mutations “mistakes”. as in, they happen but they can only be negative.

          since God’s Word is the only standard for defining proper marriage

          oh - and where’s that? the bit where multiple wives are ok (Solomon), or where multiple wives is commanded (Levrite marriage) or where slave girls are ok (“concubines” being the usual euphamism) or where polygamy is disallowed but only for church leaders (this seems like the worst one tbh, the very necessity of this rule means there were sufficient polygamous relationships in the early church that it even warrants a mention…)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1929 days ago

      What’s interesting is in Genesis 1 God created all the stuff, but in Genesis 2 it says none of the plants or animals or man had materialized yet, then God makes then an asks Adam to name them.

      I definitely read Genesis as a story of tribal origins

    • @Klear
      link
      5
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      But where does tiberium come into play?

    • @thesporkeffect
      link
      529 days ago

      Ive heard people say that Adam being the first human is metaphorical in the text, and means “first YHWH worshipper”, not sure how widespread or accurate this view is.

      • Zloubida
        link
        1929 days ago

        Accurate, not at all.

        Widespread, not much.

        The general answers to this question is or that Cain married his sister (fundamentalist view) or that Adam and Cain are metaphors and didn’t existed at all (mainline view).