• @primrosepathspeedrun
    link
    31 month ago

    just because he’s fucked, doesn’t mean he’s gotten any better. doesn’t mean he doesn’t hate women any less. probably resents having to fuck one for his public image.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      11 month ago

      And I never implied any of that. Just that it’s silly to call someone a thing with a literal meaning as though words don’t matter. And yes he’s not any better off, just different.

      • @primrosepathspeedrun
        link
        21 month ago

        brevity, especially in explicitly political messages, matters. nuance WILL be lost, communication has two sides, and sometimes you cannot convey perfect truth, you need to lose a little fidelity. so “JD vance is an incel” is true enough for literal government work.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          31 month ago

          “JD Vance is a misogynist”

          Brief and accurate. Less confusing. Didn’t need to make up anything untrue or stretch any definitions to something they aren’t.

          • @primrosepathspeedrun
            link
            01 month ago

            incel is more poetic and gives more a sense of scale. ‘misogynist’ without elaboration feels smaller, less accurate.

            its a compression issue, dear. sorry.

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              21 month ago

              Ugh yeah I don’t agree that defying definitions of words makes something “poetic”. The fact is that this entire thread indicates the issue, and the upvotes I got indicate I’m not alone

              • @nomous
                link
                21 month ago

                I agree, to me “he’s an incel” is weak because to the not-terminally-online vast majority of people it’s easily proven false.

                He’s married and has kids, he’s not any more “involuntarily celibate” than Trump is.