Cox tries to get contributory infringement ruling in Sony lawsuit overturned.

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

  • @[email protected]English
    78•7 months ago

    Which is absolutely ridiculous since you are paying for the water that you are sharing.

      • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
        13•7 months ago

        We all know implicitly that it’s not illegal to share your water because it’s unethical. It is illegal because making it illegal protects the water company’s profits, humanity be damned.

        it’s perfectly ethical, unless i’m stealing the water, they’re using the same water i’m using and that means i’m paying for it. It’s literally not a problem.

        It might cut flat charges but, get fucked.

        • @[email protected]English
          17•7 months ago

          I think you misinterpreted, because you two are saying the same thing. It is ethical to share. Therefore, it has not been made illegal for being unethical (because it is ethical), it has been made illegal to protect profits.

      • @[email protected]English
        4•7 months ago

        For sure. Even when it isn’t a law the same outcome happens when corporations get the police to enforce their policies.

      • @Lost_My_MindEnglish
        3•7 months ago

        How though? If you’re using extra water to share with your neighbor, and YOU still pay your water bill, they still get extra money for extra usage, right? It just comes from your wallet rather than your neighbors.