Although I’m happy Lemmy got rid of public karma counts, it would be nice if it had a non-public karma floor after which the account would be automatically banned for manual review or at least an icon showing that the account doesn’t contribute in a positive manner.
Yep! Instead of following the person around, and pointing out unimportant facts, and being mad just because someone is not voting the way they do.
it would be nice if it had a non-public karma floor after which the account would be automatically banned for manual review or at least an icon showing that the account doesn’t contribute in a positive manner.
Plenty of people who make comments to me daily who would receive that icon.
And they comment just because they’re mad that I’m not voting for their presidential candidate. Isn’t that weird, that someone would be so upset by that that they’d comment to me almost daily?! And follow me around on Lemmy?
And all because I’m not voting for their presidential candidate or being baited into getting mad when they try to shitpost. But hey, people are strange, man…
being mad just because someone is not voting the way they do.
And they comment just because they’re mad that I’m not voting for their presidential candidate
all because I’m not voting for their presidential candidate
Have I ever been mad at you for who you are choosing to vote for, are you trying to derail the conversation and look like a victim right now?
If you would like to share a comment where I’ve gotten mad at you for wanting to vote for Cornel West or whoever you’d like show us all the receipts please or stop uncivilly accusing me of untrue things.
Plenty of people who make comments to me daily who would receive that icon.
Does that mean you’re agreeing that it would be a good thing?
So wait, are you doing those things I outlined? I mean, are you following me around on Lemmy? All because you’re mad I can’t be baited and that I won’t vote a certain way? I mean are you saying you are doing that or that you are not doing that? I’m confused.
It’s a small platform, when you post and comment over a thousand times in ten days you’re going to see some familiar faces.
All because you’re mad I can’t be baited and that I won’t vote a certain way? I mean are you saying you are doing that or that you are not doing that? I’m confused.
You’re accusing me of this like you did in the PMs I shared but you are unable to share proof because it doesn’t exist.
So are you saying that you are following me around? Or that you’re not? I’m confused.
But I guess it doesn’t really matter because this conversation isn’t about the article I’ve submitted. So please keep comments focused to this article in this thread and stay civil. Thank you.
Good for you! Again though, you don’t need to feel bad about not posting as much as I do—it’s not a competition.
Lemmy thrives on post contributions because they help grow community conversations. Thanks for your interest in how much I post!
Lemmy thrives on high-quality post contributions.
Although I’m happy Lemmy got rid of public karma counts, it would be nice if it had a non-public karma floor after which the account would be automatically banned for manual review or at least an icon showing that the account doesn’t contribute in a positive manner.
That’d be useful. Way to troll, GPS. It’d be great if I could be paid to be on Lemmy. Must be nice.
Yep! Instead of following the person around, and pointing out unimportant facts, and being mad just because someone is not voting the way they do.
Plenty of people who make comments to me daily who would receive that icon.
And they comment just because they’re mad that I’m not voting for their presidential candidate. Isn’t that weird, that someone would be so upset by that that they’d comment to me almost daily?! And follow me around on Lemmy?
And all because I’m not voting for their presidential candidate or being baited into getting mad when they try to shitpost. But hey, people are strange, man…
Have I ever been mad at you for who you are choosing to vote for, are you trying to derail the conversation and look like a victim right now?
If you would like to share a comment where I’ve gotten mad at you for wanting to vote for Cornel West or whoever you’d like show us all the receipts please or stop uncivilly accusing me of untrue things.
Does that mean you’re agreeing that it would be a good thing?
Oh gosh, what made you think I was talking about you specifically?
Is there a particular reason you assumed I was talking about you? I mean, have you done any of those things that I outlined?!
You constantly accuse me of such but you never bring the proof.
I think you don’t like being challenged to explain yourself.
So wait, are you doing those things I outlined? I mean, are you following me around on Lemmy? All because you’re mad I can’t be baited and that I won’t vote a certain way? I mean are you saying you are doing that or that you are not doing that? I’m confused.
It’s a small platform, when you post and comment over a thousand times in ten days you’re going to see some familiar faces.
You’re accusing me of this like you did in the PMs I shared but you are unable to share proof because it doesn’t exist.
So are you saying that you are following me around? Or that you’re not? I’m confused.
But I guess it doesn’t really matter because this conversation isn’t about the article I’ve submitted. So please keep comments focused to this article in this thread and stay civil. Thank you.