@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agoCore 2 Ruleofiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1833arrow-down15starcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
arrow-up1828arrow-down1imageCore 2 Ruleofiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square62fedilinkstarcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@NewNewAccountlink12•6 months ago5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives. arrow-up112arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@trigonatedlink1•6 months agoAnd if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one. arrow-up11arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•6 months agoAs I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds. The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green’s (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments). arrow-up12arrow-down13file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives.
And if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one.
As I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds.
The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green’s (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments).