There’s no such thing as collective liberty without personal liberty.
Also when person A says to person B “kill C” and B kills C, you don’t have to prosecute speech to punish A. They’ve made a request, or a command, which B follows.
There’s countries where the personal right to not be harassed is valued higher than the right to harass people. France is one of them. UK as well I believe.
You also don’t get to spread lies about someone and make them a target.
There’s countries where the personal right to not be harassed is valued higher than the right to harass people. France is one of them. UK as well I believe.
Completely irrelevant who wrote what in which law.
You also don’t get to spread lies about someone and make them a target.
Telling lies is an attack on the listener. To determine lies in specific situations is sometimes a problem.
One has to split them that fine as a civilized human.
Because free speech is not about letting people you agree to disagree with speak, it’s about letting people you’d want quartered speak. That is, not deciding whether they speak at all.
Um the guy used flowery language and made weird non-sequiturs if you’re not convinced we should be allowed to say the N word on TV by now I’m not sure what it will take
There’s no such thing as collective liberty without personal liberty.
Also when person A says to person B “kill C” and B kills C, you don’t have to prosecute speech to punish A. They’ve made a request, or a command, which B follows.
There’s countries where the personal right to not be harassed is valued higher than the right to harass people. France is one of them. UK as well I believe.
You also don’t get to spread lies about someone and make them a target.
Completely irrelevant who wrote what in which law.
Telling lies is an attack on the listener. To determine lies in specific situations is sometimes a problem.
ok dismiss it without thinking about it. I guess things like human rights theory are wrong about individual and collective rights.
Theory can be objective on something objectively existing. Theory of a thing in itself can’t be right or wrong.
Apparently when internet commenters want to argue my opinions, the best of them decide not to.
This 28 year old libertarian has it all figured out, everyone else can go home now
Not it all, just you
What’s the difference between a request or a command and speech?
Well, if one gets me in trouble, then i did the other.
One is participating in a decision, another is all communication.
Do you ever have to use anything to augment your vision when you’re splitting hairs that fine?
One has to split them that fine as a civilized human.
Because free speech is not about letting people you agree to disagree with speak, it’s about letting people you’d want quartered speak. That is, not deciding whether they speak at all.
Hasn’t it already been established that free speech has limitations?
Just like one’s right to own and use knives has limitations and no more.
Sorry, what are you talking about now?
Um the guy used flowery language and made weird non-sequiturs if you’re not convinced we should be allowed to say the N word on TV by now I’m not sure what it will take