• Flying SquidOP
    link
    1020 days ago

    Go ahead and define a woman for us then. Since you seem to know the definition.

      • vistencluse
        link
        15
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        “A woman is someone with XY chromosomes…”

        off to a good start

        • DMBFFF
          link
          120 days ago

          Removed by mod

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            220 days ago

            Cool. Thanks for your queerphobic take.

            • DMBFFF
              link
              020 days ago

              Disagreement with the politically correct about transgender is necessarily transphobic.

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                220 days ago

                Do tell me where you studied genetics at a graduate level to make the determination you just made.

                Otherwise yeah, you’re being a queerphobe.

                • DMBFFF
                  link
                  020 days ago

                  Your right: only the elite and/or those with a university degrees can discuss this issue.

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    220 days ago

                    You are defining a woman by her genes. So yes, I expect you to have a university degree to be able to make such an authoritative definition.

                    Just like I would expect you to have a degree in physics before making an authoritative definition based on properties of physics.

                    Believe it or not, Facebook University isn’t a real university.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            5
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            I see. And what about people with Swyer Syndrome? They can live their entire lives with no one, not even them, suspecting their chromosomes are XY. Men? Should we be genetically testing every woman to make sure she isn’t really a man and doesn’t know it?

            • DMBFFF
              link
              020 days ago

              Such a person can compete in womens sports FAIC.

              wp:Swyer syndrome

              A 2017 study estimated that the incidence of Swyer syndrome is approximately 1 in 100,000 females.[22] Fewer than 100 cases have been reported as of 2018. There are extremely rare instances of familial Swyer syndrome.[23][24]

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                220 days ago

                You are defining ‘woman’ by whether or not sports officials decide they can compete with other women? And then you try to use science afterward?

                • DMBFFF
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  20 days ago

                  I think anyone who defines wt:thonself as a woman should be able to compete in any Olympic event as a woman.

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    220 days ago

                    You do know that we can see your post history, right?

                    But this ‘thon’ thing is very droll. I’m sure you think you’ve done a real gotcha with it.

          • @I_Has_A_Hat
            link
            420 days ago

            Seems like if you have to make exceptions for your definition to work, it’s not a very good definition.