For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”

  • (⬤ᴥ⬤)
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    using “he/she” to refer to an ambiguous party. just use they for fucks sake

    • @clickyello
      link
      925 days ago

      agreed for humans, but I do like calling cars/boats/bikes/machines “she”. makes me feel like a pirate :)

      • (⬤ᴥ⬤)
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        oh im not talking about that.
        i’m talking about quasi-legalese phrases like “he/she may […]” “if he/she agrees”, you know. the places where “they” would be both more grammatical and easier to understand

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              624 days ago

              yeah, but its an ambiguity that can be picked at in legal settings. He/she makes it very clear that only singular person is being referred to

              • fakeaustinfloyd
                link
                fedilink
                324 days ago

                I guess I found my hill:

                If you are worried about your sentence leaving ambiguity for your pronouns, then write a better sentence.

              • JackbyDev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                224 days ago

                Alright, that’s fair, they did specifically say legalese.

        • @RBWells
          link
          224 days ago

          I have been learning Spanish with Babbel and the

          El/Ella Compra

          Will never not sound wrong to me. El & Ella are two people, they Compran something they don’t Compra it.

          But They as a singular in English absolutely just rolls off my tongue, makes absolute sense, it is what I use.

        • @clickyello
          link
          124 days ago

          ohhh yeah I figured my take was only tangentially related but it’s even further than I thought. yeah that stuff is silly and also denies the existence of nb folx, lame. I’ve been (somewhat) successful in using “they” to refer to anyone that I don’t directly know the gender of for inclusivity’s sake. it really isn’t that hard to get used to if you’re willing to make an effort.

        • @dufkm
          link
          -224 days ago

          Yeah, in those cases I sometimes just put “she” instead. If they are the type of person to get upset by that (presumably because it’s a he that doesn’t want to be mistaken for a she), it’s precisely the person I want to offend. Reasonable people don’t care.