I’m guessing the photos she’s referencing weren’t edited back when she was still a teen, and that someone recently took the older photos and ran them through AI.
It says she received them when she was 14, 7 years ago. Not that it isn’t a problem and that problem is definitely worse because of AI, it just to show that this has been happening a long time and that trying to blame it on AI when it happened 7 years ago is bad journalism.
In the original interview, she makes it clear that there several incidents and that the AI images she got were the last straw which convinced her to delete Twitter.
In the legal sense and clarity of AI scrutiny it’s important what we pin on the movement of “Ai” and what is on a pervert taking hours on a photo editing software. The explicit imagery is disgusting either way, but a headline screaming “Ai images led this famous actress to delete Twitter in disgust and shame” vs “some pervert created photoshopped images of Ortega that led her to delete Twitter” changes the perspective of where our outrage is. Don’t mistake it, image generation via prompts should 100% be controlled, but using this event to promote outrage towards that with misleading headlines isn’t the way.
There wasn’t AI image generation when she was a teen, it was regular photoshop.
I’m guessing the photos she’s referencing weren’t edited back when she was still a teen, and that someone recently took the older photos and ran them through AI.
It says she received them when she was 14, 7 years ago. Not that it isn’t a problem and that problem is definitely worse because of AI, it just to show that this has been happening a long time and that trying to blame it on AI when it happened 7 years ago is bad journalism.
In the original interview, she makes it clear that there several incidents and that the AI images she got were the last straw which convinced her to delete Twitter.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
You seriously think there were no other incidents since seven years ago? Lol
People like you and the other two commenters are part of the reason the Internet is horrible. Fuck off with your dumb ass “corrections”.
In the legal sense and clarity of AI scrutiny it’s important what we pin on the movement of “Ai” and what is on a pervert taking hours on a photo editing software. The explicit imagery is disgusting either way, but a headline screaming “Ai images led this famous actress to delete Twitter in disgust and shame” vs “some pervert created photoshopped images of Ortega that led her to delete Twitter” changes the perspective of where our outrage is. Don’t mistake it, image generation via prompts should 100% be controlled, but using this event to promote outrage towards that with misleading headlines isn’t the way.
Cool. Another achualy idiot to block. Thanks.
Only the highest class of narcissistic loser announces they’re blocking someone online.
Do you really think anyone else gives a shit? lol
Do you really think the person you’re replying to cares about your opinion? Or is your reply merely performative?
Obviously you care
Yeah but if you put AI in the title anyways it gets more clicks and the AI stuff is also a problem so it all balances out ehhhhh