• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    wait, what are you even buying then?!

    I thought (i) at least served as a proof of ownership for (ii)…

    • @ocassionallyaduck
      link
      English
      16
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Nope.

      This is why anyone not huffing paint has stayed far away from NFTs.

    • @AlotOfReading
      link
      English
      63 months ago

      No, the “non-fungibility” simply means that anyone who creates an NFT with the same link will be distinct from your link to the image, even if the actual URL is the same. Both NFTs can also be traced back to when they were created/minted because they’re on a blockchain, a property called provenance. If the authentic tokens came from a well known minting, you can establish that your token is “authentic” and the copy token is a recreation, even if the actual link (or other content) is completely identical.

      Nothing about having the “authentic” token would give you actual legal rights though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        yeah, I understand the tech far better than I understand the law. I thought they legally counted as a contract, i guess they’re not even that.

        • @General_Effort
          link
          English
          03 months ago

          For a contract transferring property, you need 2 parties: One offering and the other accepting. Having knowledge of a cryptographic key implies none of that.

          You could get something like this done by transferring the asset to a reputable trustee. The trustee - a law firm, bank, or such - checks that the paperwork is in order and it has the necessary rights. It binds itself contractually to convey some benefit - eg a revocable copyright license - to whoever can show that they have a certain cryptographic key/control of a wallet.

          The firm should regularly check if the beneficiary still holds the key. It might get lost or forgotten, after all. The possibility of losing access to the asset by theft or accident is the only thing that involving NFTs add to such a scheme, so one might as well lean into it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      At best you’re buying into a collective agreement of ownership among those also participating in the NFT ecosystem. You own a thing because a large enough group of people agree you own it and respect the authority of that token.

      At worst you’ve been scammed and are trying to convince yourself the above is true and that said “large enough group” includes anyone at all capable of enforcing said ownership. Spoilers: it does not.

    • @sugartits
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • @sugartits
        link
        English
        13 months ago

        Why did a moderator remove my comment?

        Do you want this place to die? Because excessive moderation is how this place dies.