Take a look at these quotes from articles from the past 120 years. What can we make from them? Is climate change actually a big of a deal as it’s claimed? The fact that “climate change” is such political issue gives me doubt. Any political talking point should always be scrutinized and criticized. Politicians have an agenda and will use anything they can to push that agenda.

I’m not here to argue about climate change being real or not. Rather, I would like opinions about the website I shared

  • @LetsdothisOP
    link
    -7
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Dear lordy… I’m tired of trying to explain things here. The references are on that site, the references are of articles from several different sources such the “Times”, “the Washington post”, “the new York post”. There is no “misinformation.” You can find the whole articles that are referenced if you try. The point of this is to show how climate fear mongering has been going on for at least 120 years. Sometimes, it’s global cooling, and then it changes to global warming. I believe it goes to show that we don’t have the data points to accurately determine global warming. There is so much conjecture, opinions, and political agenda around “climate change.”

    I thoroughly believed in the climate fear mongering until recently. I think I’ve lived long enough now to observe for myself that maybe all this climate change jazz is driven more by political agenda than anything else

    • @Bluetreefrog
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I thoroughly believed in the climate fear mongering until recently. I think I’ve lived long enough now to observe for myself that maybe all this climate change jazz is driven more by political agenda than anything else

      So contrary to what you said in the post, you are pushing a perspective that climate change isn’t real.

      • @LetsdothisOP
        link
        -63 months ago

        No, I’m not. That was the first time I gave my personal opinion, and I shouldn’t have because I still have doubts and haven’t actually settled on one side or the other… “Climate change” by its very nature is super complex, involving many different data sets from all over the world.

        Although, I do want people to be open to disagreeing perspectives or different scientific facts that suggest something different than the commonly accepted narrative of ANY topic anyway.

        • @Bluetreefrog
          link
          English
          33 months ago

          You are correct, we shouldn’t buy in to ‘commonly accepted narratives’. The world is complex and gaining a deep understanding of any one topic is the work of a lifetime. There is no way we can learn enough about everything to have an informed and educated opinion on every topic that we have to deal with over the course of our lives.

          Making this more challenging is the fact that human brains are not very rational. They are rationalising. Think about that for a minute. It’s helpful to realise that about other people, but the real value is when you turn that lens back on yourself. Learning to think rationally takes a lot of training and hard work. The kind of work that scientists do to learn their discipline. Shock jocks are definitely not good places to go for for rational thought and conclusions. They are selling a product. Outrage. Which is in many ways the exact opposite of rationality.

          By necessity, we have to stand on the shoulders of experts. If you want to decide how you feel about a topic look to the experts and disregard mouthpieces with no qualifications.

          The IPCC reports are the output of real research by real experts. You should read them if you haven’t already.