• Diplomjodler
    link
    1553 months ago

    Last time I checked, the executive didn’t decide about indictments or sentences. But I guess that’s all going to change if Dementia Don wins.

    • Stern
      link
      503 months ago

      Guantanamo Bay has entered the conversation.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        17
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The argument there was that they were POWs captured on the battlefield, and thus under the purview of the CinC.

        There is no way to make that argument regarding Zuckerberg.

        • @EvacuateSoul
          link
          223 months ago

          Not POWs, but enemy combatants, which they made up to avoid responsibilities to POWs.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            83 months ago

            Fair point. Regardless, not something that could be done with Zuckerberg. He couldn’t lock him up for the same reason he couldn’t lock Hillary up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          183 months ago

          The supreme court has ruled 6-3 that Zuck belongs in Gitmo because Chewbacca is a wookie and there are no wookies on Endor.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -943 months ago

      Yeah I was kind of curious as to how this story would be spun into a negative story against Trump. Anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately. Maybe “the president can’t set the sentence” will be the tack with this one?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        753 months ago

        If a life sentence is appropriate for interfering with an election, I look forward to Trump’s impending life sentence.

        Because anyone who does something illegal should be sentenced appropriately, right?

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -293 months ago

          Fair enough. The “perfect phone call” was actually pretty bad, it’s the one case against him that I think probably has a lot of merit. I was thinking at the time that it was probably illegal.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            153 months ago

            So you think he should be imprisoned for the rest of his life, right? That’s the appropriate sentence? You seem to be agreeing with Trump here.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -253 months ago

              I mean something like 10 to 20 years sounds fair to me if that’s the appropriate sentence (IDK what election interference sentences look like), which would probably end up being the rest of his life anyways

      • @Zombiepirate
        link
        English
        463 months ago

        Yeah I was kind of curious as to how this story would be spun into a negative story against Trump.

        That says more about you than it does about the story.

        Remember when his senior DOJ staff threatened to quit when he told them that a yes-man would be their boss and help overturn the election? Trump’s whole administration was about corrupting the executive branch.

        He is a racist traitor who doesn’t belong anywhere near power; he should be in prison.

        Anyone who continues to support him is a reactionary traitor, too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah, how can the potential next head of state threatening a specific individual with an arbitrary sentence of life imprisonment for some vague charge like “doing anything illegal” possibly be spun into a negative story?

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          When did crazy talk become the norm. Was it when trump first ran? Was it before? Its so hard to remember with the constant crazy talk all over.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            123 months ago

            I think it’s Trump trying to find a way. In specific, find a way to do something outside of his presidential powers.

            He wanted to “lock her up” with Hillary too. Were you one of the people chanting that? Have you noticed she hasn’t been locked up yet even though he had four years to do it?

            • Rhaedas
              link
              fedilink
              93 months ago

              And long investigation hearings that she didn’t fall asleep in.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -273 months ago

              Have you noticed she hasn’t been locked up yet even though he had four years to do it?

              I’ll just leave that there. It makes the point I would have made pretty succinctly.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                83 months ago

                The point that he makes threats about imprisoning people and can’t follow through because it’s not within his abilities?

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    73 months ago

                    Well maybe that should be your point since that really shows what he’s saying in the article is meaningless.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        243 months ago

        You do realize that when Trump says “anything illegal” he really means “anything I don’t like”, right?

        Also, surely you think that Trump should be sentenced appropriately for violating federal law at Arlington cemetery?

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -353 months ago

          The logical line of “when the guy I don’t like says anything, he really means what I say he means” is pretty errant and toxic. I cringe when the right does it too, “you can tell a Democrat is lying because they’ve opened their mouth”. It’s stupid and ridiculous.

          IDK what happened for sure at the cemetery, I’d need some footage and to read up on the pertaining law a little before I make a judgement on that.

          • @rockSlayer
            link
            113 months ago

            I don’t know if you’ve kept your head buried in the sand for 8 years, but all we’ve seen is Trump proving that he believes any perceived wrongdoing to himself is a crime. It’s a CEO philosophy of fire anyone that disagrees.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -123 months ago

              The US Army releasing a statement that a) what Trump and his campaign did there was illegal and b) that they physically attacked the person who tried to stop them from breaking the law isn’t good enough for you?

              Why would it be? Does the government tell the truth all the time?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Trump has proven that’s what he means at literally every possible opportunity for nearly a decade. You cannot possibly not have come to that realization without purposefully ignoring it because you like him, claiming it’s some weird partisan issue is certifiably weird.

            He took a campaign photo in section 60 at the cemetery, that is a violation of federal law. You don’t need a video, you’re just giving him a pass because you don’t care what he does or who it hurts.

      • poo
        link
        English
        83 months ago

        Diaper Don belongs in prison