U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has repeatedly claimed that she worked at McDonald’s while getting her undergraduate degree in the 1980s. This claim has been reported by multiple reputable news outlets, but aside from Harris’ own testimony, there is no independent evidence such as a photo, employment record, or confirmation from a friend or family member to verify the story. Harris has invoked the alleged McDonald’s work experience throughout her political career, including in a 2024 presidential campaign ad and during a 2024 appearance on “The Drew Barrymore Show.” Other prominent Democrats, such as former President Bill Clinton, have also repeated the anecdote. However, some internet users have challenged the claim, with unverified reports that “McDonald’s Corporate sources” have no record of Harris working at their locations. Snopes reached out to Harris’ campaign and McDonald’s headquarters seeking evidence to corroborate the claim, but as of the report’s publication, no such proof has been uncovered. Without tangible evidence to independently confirm or debunk the story, Snopes has rated the claim “Research In Progress” as they continue to investigate.

  • mozz
    link
    fedilink
    204 months ago

    what matters is Harris said it to show solidarity to the workers in the US to garner their votes

    What a perfectly sensible reason to let Trump come to power and order the military to start shooting protestors with live ammunition

    Surely, the metrics of your political decision making are totally logical

    • Verdant BananaOP
      link
      English
      -25
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      so only Republicans need to be held to a standard but not Democrats because of Trump?

      not to mention Walz got the police extra funding to put the boot to protesters and under federal approval under then President Trump in a bipartisan effort

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Line_3_protests

      Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has not taken a firm stance on the pipeline expansion, which received federal approval under the Trump administration.[18][23]

      • TJA!
        link
        fedilink
        114 months ago

        So who are you voting for? And why?

        • Verdant BananaOP
          link
          English
          -17
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          not allowed to vote because of bipartisan politics

          but Claudia De la Cruz would have my vote if were able to

          seems to be genuinely for the people

          • theprogressivist
            link
            10
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Only reason you can’t legally vote in the US is if you’re a felon. Otherwise, you’re abstaining meaning you can vote you just choose not to.

            • Verdant BananaOP
              link
              English
              -174 months ago

              more reasons than being a felon that keep US citizens from voting

              • mozz
                link
                fedilink
                114 months ago

                Fascinating

                Some of our readers aren’t from the US - you wanna expand a little for their benefit what bipartisan things besides being a felon might randomly disqualify someone from voting? They might not be first hand familiar with it like you are.

              • theprogressivist
                link
                8
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Very unlikely. Again, abstaining ≠ not being allowed to vote.