U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has repeatedly claimed that she worked at McDonald’s while getting her undergraduate degree in the 1980s. This claim has been reported by multiple reputable news outlets, but aside from Harris’ own testimony, there is no independent evidence such as a photo, employment record, or confirmation from a friend or family member to verify the story. Harris has invoked the alleged McDonald’s work experience throughout her political career, including in a 2024 presidential campaign ad and during a 2024 appearance on “The Drew Barrymore Show.” Other prominent Democrats, such as former President Bill Clinton, have also repeated the anecdote. However, some internet users have challenged the claim, with unverified reports that “McDonald’s Corporate sources” have no record of Harris working at their locations. Snopes reached out to Harris’ campaign and McDonald’s headquarters seeking evidence to corroborate the claim, but as of the report’s publication, no such proof has been uncovered. Without tangible evidence to independently confirm or debunk the story, Snopes has rated the claim “Research In Progress” as they continue to investigate.

  • Verdant BananaOP
    link
    English
    -25
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    so only Republicans need to be held to a standard but not Democrats because of Trump?

    not to mention Walz got the police extra funding to put the boot to protesters and under federal approval under then President Trump in a bipartisan effort

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Line_3_protests

    Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has not taken a firm stance on the pipeline expansion, which received federal approval under the Trump administration.[18][23]

    • TJA!
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      So who are you voting for? And why?

      • Verdant BananaOP
        link
        English
        -17
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        not allowed to vote because of bipartisan politics

        but Claudia De la Cruz would have my vote if were able to

        seems to be genuinely for the people

        • theprogressivist
          link
          10
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Only reason you can’t legally vote in the US is if you’re a felon. Otherwise, you’re abstaining meaning you can vote you just choose not to.

          • Verdant BananaOP
            link
            English
            -174 months ago

            more reasons than being a felon that keep US citizens from voting

            • mozz
              link
              fedilink
              114 months ago

              Fascinating

              Some of our readers aren’t from the US - you wanna expand a little for their benefit what bipartisan things besides being a felon might randomly disqualify someone from voting? They might not be first hand familiar with it like you are.

            • theprogressivist
              link
              8
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Very unlikely. Again, abstaining ≠ not being allowed to vote.