• Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    73 months ago

    There is. The SLS. That is much more economical, right?

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      Indeed. And Boeing is the main contractor for it so you can be sure it won’t suffer any mishaps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      That sounds so futuristic.

      As it’s NASA is it using technology decades more advanced than the competition?

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        Oh definitely. And an absolute steal at just 2.5 billion a pop.

      • @Cocodapuf
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        Are you joking? Well the answer is no, no the SLS is about 40 years behind as far as technology goes. It’s basically a shuttle derived launch vehicle, the boosters are similar to the shuttle side boosters and it uses 4 slightly updated RS-25s (the space shuttle main engines) in the center stage.

        Except instead of getting with the times and attempting some reusability, it actually has less reusability than the shuttle had. They actually throw away all of those expensive high performance hydrolox engines on every launch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          I was just leaning into the joke Diplo started.

          Most people on Lemmy make their mind up on nothing except “Elon bad memes”

          • @Cocodapuf
            link
            English
            23 months ago

            Yeah, the hivemind can get pretty tiresome.