Obviously, given the subject matter, I had to let ChatGPT generate a summary for this:

The Meta Stack Overflow post discusses a policy decision regarding the use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, on the platform. The key points include:

  1. Ban on Generative AI: The community has decided to prohibit the use of generative AI for answering questions on Stack Overflow. This is due to concerns about the quality and reliability of AI-generated content.
  1. Quality Control: The decision aims to maintain high standards for answers, as AI-generated responses may lack accuracy and context, potentially leading to misinformation.
  1. Community Feedback: The policy was influenced by feedback from the community, emphasizing the importance of human expertise in providing reliable answers.
  1. Future Considerations: The post suggests that while the current stance is a ban, the situation may be revisited in the future as the technology evolves.

Overall, the policy reflects a commitment to ensuring that the content on Stack Overflow remains trustworthy and valuable to its users.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    273 months ago

    Yeah this is just them trying to prevent model collapse (stemming from pollution of training data by ai garbage). The moral thing to do here is to not give a fuck and upload as much AI garbage as possible to poison their dataset. Fucking assholes.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      “Avoid model collapse” aka “avoid giving garbage answers”. If they’re gonna use a lot of energy to train an AI, why not at least make the product good-ish?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        If you allow them to make money with their garbage, they will be incentivized to keep going. I want them to go bankrupt.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Until we manage to unite the workers in revolution, groups shouldn’t be attacked solely because they’re trying to make more profit for a little amount of harm. It’s nearly the only way groups can survive if they’re bent on being a company.

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      33 months ago

      Does the harm that does to the community not factor into your moral calculus?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I does factor that in and my answer is to abandon ship or mutiny. By contributing to their ecosystem you validate their sense of not having done anything wrong.

        As we have seen with reddit, the next step here is closing off API access and banning searchengines and crawlers from using the sites resources. At that point there is little value left in the platform just like with reddit.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Stack Overflow only pretends to care about their community and I’m tired of contributing the greater good of the technical community at large (edit: by contributing to Stack Overflow). Stack Overflow has a track record of ignoring Meta. Why even have it if you’re not going to listen?

        • @Feathercrown
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          Ok, but why would you know that and then go harm the community yourself too?

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            I’m not advocating for maliciously using AI generated content to make Stack Overflow worse, I’m just saying I feel no motivation to seek questions to answer there nor to waste my time posting good questions there that I research and find no duplicates of only for them to be closed.

            • @Feathercrown
              link
              English
              13 months ago

              Ah, I confused you with the person I had originally replied to