• archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1715 days ago

    If the democrats weren’t insisting on holding water for Israel’s genocide, the green party wouldn’t even be a nuisance to them.

    Say whatever you want about how crazy they are, but the one issue the democrats are actually hurting from is their genocide support. If for no other reason than to push the dems to change that policy I think the greens are a huge benefit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -115 days ago

      Absolutely right. All the people in my mentions are mad at this fact. I keep trying to tell them that it doesn’t matter what Stein’s whole platform is, as long as she has a saner opinion than the dems on genocide, she will be an alternative for a lot of people. Her voters know she won’t win, but they will not vote in support of a genocide! It’s not “single issue voting”, it’s having a moral baseline.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        414 days ago

        It’s not “single issue voting”, it’s having a moral baseline.

        Sounds like both could be true at the same time.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        English
        -114 days ago

        If someone is going to vote for Stein because of genocide they’re definitely not going to vote for Harris even if Stein wasn’t running.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Some would, some wouldn’t.

          Edit: This is especially true right now, since there is a huge group of (otherwise dem) voters for whom the genocide is a dealbreaker. See the ‘Undecided’ movement for a clear example.