• @kerrigan778
    link
    229 days ago

    Because products sold as non-psychoactive should generally actually be non-psychoactive. Though personally I appreciate it from the perspective of I’d like to be able to eat hemp protein without failing a drug test.

    • @CM400M
      link
      169 days ago

      I feel you on that, but drug tests are bullshit anyway. Unless a test can reliably tell that you’re under the influence at work, they shouldn’t be able to use them.

      • @kerrigan778
        link
        9
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I mean, agreed, but I’m working for the DOT so… Not a lot I can do about that at least until it gets rescheduled. Hopefully if it gets rescheduled people can get a federally acknowledged prescription and the ADA should take care of the rest.

    • @Today
      link
      39 days ago

      If it were just about protecting the public, they would require a label of ingredients, which most items already have.

      • @kerrigan778
        link
        19 days ago

        The… The ingredient is hemp, it’s one ingredient.

        • @Today
          link
          19 days ago

          Most of the hemp I’ve bought included (or had available online) a certificate of analysis. With the rest, i knew what i was getting because it was labeled type 1, 2, or 3.

      • @Today
        link
        69 days ago

        No. Only ∆9 is limited. Per the farm bill, thca is hemp, so the same stuff you would buy at a dispensary can be legally purchased online and shipped to all but a handful of states. It’s all about the money.