101 to politics English • 7 days agoTrump falsely accuses immigrants in Ohio of abducting, eating pets.www.voanews.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1183arrow-down15
arrow-up1178arrow-down1external-linkTrump falsely accuses immigrants in Ohio of abducting, eating pets.www.voanews.com101 to politics English • 7 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-square@EvilBitlink10•7 days agoI’m wary af of this outlet, but kudos to them for flat out saying “falsely accuses” at least.
minus-square@BrianTheeBiscuiteerlink8•7 days agoI’d say it’s more like he “baselessly accuses” them. Saying your source is social media is about as meaningful as saying your source is your gut.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•edit-27 days agoHe said his source was “a man on TV.” Not even social media. He saw “a man” on the “tv” say it, so it must be true. Did he specify what man? No. What TV show? No. The moderators had comments from Springfield officials, and he had a nebulous TV man. That’s just false, not even baseless.
minus-squareGithyankilinkfedilink1•7 days agoI’m a man, and I’m on TV. So a man on TV said it. And a very credible man I should add, as I am very credible. So your source is yourself, saying what you said right now?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•7 days agoHe had a portable tv and was watching himself as he said it in the debate. Trumpception.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-27 days agoPerson, woman, man, camera, TV. It all comes full circle. The top has been spinning the whole time.
minus-square@EvilBitlink5•7 days agoThe moderators had preemptively contacted the city manager of Springfield, Ohio. That person said it isn’t happening. Do you need more?
minus-square@EvilBitlink1•7 days agoI mean to qualify as “falsely”, which is stronger than “baselessly”. I don’t doubt your position, I’m just appreciating that a media outlet is calling out falsehoods clearly without using softened terms.
I’m wary af of this outlet, but kudos to them for flat out saying “falsely accuses” at least.
I’d say it’s more like he “baselessly accuses” them. Saying your source is social media is about as meaningful as saying your source is your gut.
He said his source was “a man on TV.”
Not even social media. He saw “a man” on the “tv” say it, so it must be true. Did he specify what man? No. What TV show? No.
The moderators had comments from Springfield officials, and he had a nebulous TV man.
That’s just false, not even baseless.
I’m a man, and I’m on TV. So a man on TV said it. And a very credible man I should add, as I am very credible.
So your source is yourself, saying what you said right now?
Man. Woman. Person. Camera. TV.
He had a portable tv and was watching himself as he said it in the debate.
Trumpception.
Person, woman, man, camera, TV.
It all comes full circle. The top has been spinning the whole time.
The moderators had preemptively contacted the city manager of Springfield, Ohio. That person said it isn’t happening. Do you need more?
Did I sound like I believed a lick of his nonsense?
I mean to qualify as “falsely”, which is stronger than “baselessly”. I don’t doubt your position, I’m just appreciating that a media outlet is calling out falsehoods clearly without using softened terms.