Because let’s say you’re Tom Hanks. And you get [email protected]

Well, what’s stopping someone else from adopting [email protected]?

And some platforms minimize the text size of platform, or hide it entirely. So you just might see TomHanks, and think it’s him. But it’s actually a 7 year old Chinese boy with a broken leg in Arizona.

Because anyone can grab the same name, on a different platform.

  • @Lost_My_MindOP
    link
    English
    12 months ago

    But it would.

    Imagine Kamala Harris as president had a mastodon account. And somebody else made a duplicate Kamala Harris account. And this duplicate announced that the United States has gone to war with Russia.

    Except these media stations don’t know how the fediverse works. They don’t know what an instance is. They just see Kamala Harris on social media announcing war.

    And in media you HAVE to be the first to break the news story. So now you have every major news outlet confirming nuclear war, and the nation is panicing.

    Meanwhile, Harris is trying to figure out how this all started. And this whole thing maybe lasts 10-60 minutes before somebody notices the mistake. Then it takes time to correct themselves and calm everybody down.

    All over something that isn’t happening. All because people don’t check sources.

    Now this is an extreme example, but I could see it happening if the fediverse was bigger, under it’s current setup.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Or, all accounts in the fedi are anonymous by nature, and if they need to be verified, they are verified on 3rd party sources.

          • @Lost_My_MindOP
            link
            English
            -22 months ago

            Then people won’t sign up for it.

            The fediverse as it stands right now is confusing enough as it is for new people. Now you’re saying you want to add in the chaos that comes from everybody being annonomous? They say that the internet, and trolling, and threats of violence are encouraged online because you’re annonomous. And now you want to highlight that feature on a service thats hard enough to grasp without nazis and death threats.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Who cares? Like, none of this matters. Don’t put the fedivwrse on a pedestal

              Nothing here is verified internally, and shouldn’t be. Centralization is antithetical to the decentralized nature of the fediverse.

              • @Lost_My_MindOP
                link
                English
                02 months ago

                Right now it’s not just decentralized. It’s fractured. It should operate as decentralized, but from a performance standpoint it should feel like it’s centralized.

                Remember, most normies won’t know or care what decentralized even is. But the reason sites like instagram have users isn’t because it’s centralized. It’s because that’s where the content is.

                Peertube is suffering HARD from lack of content. Which is why you want celebrities bringing exposure to the fediverse. They bring content.

                Go outside to a popular public place and ask 100 people in person how many people have heard of the fediverse. I’d be SHOCKED if 1 person knew what it was.

                Now get a popular youtuber like markiplyer, or good mythical morning, to post their stuff exclusively on peertube, and suddenly 2-6 million people all flock over and create accounts.