Aside from racism. I mean economically/socially, what issues does too much immigration cause?

  • @CryophiliaOP
    link
    182 months ago

    Would more supply of workers (even naturalized ones) not drive down wages too?

    • @Acamon
      link
      252 months ago

      An increase in supply would reduce wages, unless it also increases demand. If you think about wages in cities vs rural areas, you’ll see that most of the time more people = more economic activity = higher wages.

      Where this breaks down, is if there’s barriers of entry that prevent immigrants from participating in the economy fully. If immigrants aren’t allowed to legally work or start business (as happens with some asylum seekers or ‘illegal’ immigrants) then they are forced to compete over a small pool of off-book / cash-in-hand jobs, which could see a reduction in wages without a significant increase in overall economic activity.

      • @CryophiliaOP
        link
        92 months ago

        Sounds like an argument for amnesty for illegals honestly. And more relaxed legal immigration pathways.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      Eh, it doesn’t really seem like that tends to happen… economies are weird and if you keep adding people you tend to just get more and more service jobs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        Doesn’t sound that weird. More people means more people to serve, so more service jobs are needed.

        • @Klear
          link
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          and now you need houses for people to live in and people to make the houses, and now there’s more people and they invent things, which makes things better and more people come and there’s more farming and more people to make more things for more people and now there’s business, money, writing, laws, power,

        • Obinice
          link
          02 months ago

          But where does the extra money and infrastructure come from to provide everything they need?

          More people means more mouths to feed, more strain on the limited housing market driving prices and inaccessibility up, more capacity required at hospitals, doctor’s surgeries, schools, all public services (meaning everything from more doctors, nurses, consumables, locations, etc needed), and so on.

          Where does the money come from to provide for the net influx of 500,000+~ people a year, a population increase of some 0.75%?

          I’m not against immigration, welcoming people from other cultures with fresh ideas and outlooks on life is great and I love it, but the strain it places immediately on our already failing societal systems, such as healthcare, education, housing availability, job availability, etc, is very real, and needs to be addressed.

          • @CryophiliaOP
            link
            82 months ago

            more capacity required at hospitals, doctor’s surgeries, schools, all public services (meaning everything from more doctors, nurses, consumables, locations, etc needed)

            So, skilled, high paying jobs? More architects, more plumbers, more software developers, more of all kinds of jobs

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            But where does the extra money and infrastructure come from to provide everything they need?

            What is money in the first place? It represents labour and resources. So when a new person shows up, they themselves provide the money in the form of their labour. They are the money.

          • @jpreston2005
            link
            32 months ago

            That money comes from taxes that rise with increased economic activity that rise with the population.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You don’t necessarily need more money, just more flow. Imagine 20 people sitting in a circle, each with a colored stone in their left hand, and $20 in their right. Everyone gives the $20 to the person on the right, and takes the colored stone. Everyone gets the stone they wanted, and everyone paid with $20. Now imagine only one person has a $20… the same exchange happens, but it goes sequentially.

            Now, and I’m not advocating the removal of all fat-cats and big-wigs and promoting a cookbook here, but where things get really fucked up is you have businesses and governments inserting themselves as the intermediary in every one of those exchanges, and siphoning a little for themselves. If, in our example, the stone costs $10, and a business siphons $0.55 from each exchange, it ends up with $11, and everyone else is now at $19.45. Repeat until the business has $209, and everyone else is at $9.55… It gets even worse if the exchange is sequential, where only $20 exists to begin with. Ideally you would have a wise government who controls the money taxing and managing the overall picture, but complicated doesn’t begin to describe it. We’ve made everyone start equal in our example, and all have the exact same exchange. You can expand with different skills and services and products as you want, like imagining a coal miner and a farmer trying to be in the same circle with an oil worker and shrimp fisher.

            I’m just bullshitting here, but I’d bet the US is sitting somewhere around the $11-12 mark right now. More and more people are feeling the squeeze as the companies get closer to having all the power simply by having the resources to get what they want while the people can’t afford it.