Congressman Jamie Raskin (MD-08) and Congressman Don Beyer (VA-08) renewed their efforts to bring ranked choice voting to U.S. congressional elections, reintroducing their *Ranked Choice Voting Act *. Senator Peter Welch (D-VT) is introducing companion legislation in the Senate.

The legislation would require ranked choice voting (RCV) in all congressional primary and general elections starting in 2028, allowing voters to express support for multiple candidates for public office, with the candidate receiving the most votes declared the winner.

  • LustyArgonianMana
    link
    English
    235 days ago

    I actually think this is one issue that is okay to be a single issue voter on, because once it’s achieved then all voting afterwards will be fairer.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 days ago

      i mean, i would disagree, but i see what you’re pushing for here.

      This is an issue that exceeds the importance of almost all other issues, aside from like, the immediate danger that electing trump would have.

      you should still vote, but push really hard for voting reform, shit’s important.

      • LustyArgonianMana
        link
        English
        14 days ago

        Yeah exactly, I was being a bit hyperbolic there but I do think this is a unifying issue for pretty much anyone from any party.

        Funny enough the other thing that really gets people under 50 going is talking about high speed rail done well and effectively here as public transportation. Something conservative men really like about trains lol, I’ll take it

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          Yeah exactly, I was being a bit hyperbolic there but I do think this is a unifying issue for pretty much anyone from any party.

          that is true, as far as a unification tactic, both voting reform and certain public ventures would be highly effective, we should definitely setup bipartisan organizations for these things.

          • LustyArgonianMana
            link
            English
            23 days ago

            Agree :) Make government for the people, not for 2 specific political groups

            • KillingTimeItself
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 days ago

              yeah, that would be the idea. Speaking of making it for the people, i’ve thought about removing campaigning, and just instituting a “campaign policy” mandate instead. Bit of a long shot, but maybe if we knew less about these people, and cared about them less, things would be less personable, which is probably good at the federal level.

              • LustyArgonianMana
                link
                English
                22 days ago

                Yes, I am very curious to hear about ideas for campaign reform. Hard for me to imagine alternatives, for some reason

                • KillingTimeItself
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 days ago

                  that’s probably the money, and the sensibility talking, i like to imagine worlds in which really silly things happen though.

                  Wait no we live there.

        • @CheeseNoodle
          link
          English
          34 days ago

          UK resident here, beware of rich people offering you trains.