Congressman Jamie Raskin (MD-08) and Congressman Don Beyer (VA-08) renewed their efforts to bring ranked choice voting to U.S. congressional elections, reintroducing their *Ranked Choice Voting Act *. Senator Peter Welch (D-VT) is introducing companion legislation in the Senate.

The legislation would require ranked choice voting (RCV) in all congressional primary and general elections starting in 2028, allowing voters to express support for multiple candidates for public office, with the candidate receiving the most votes declared the winner.

  • @nothingcorporate
    link
    874 days ago

    This would be an unprecedented win for democracy in America, but it needs an outcry of public support to have any chance.

    Look up your congressional reps here: https://www.270towin.com/elected-officials/ and contact them to urge their support.

    Remember, we’re not outnumbered, we’re out organized.

    • LustyArgonianMana
      link
      English
      234 days ago

      I actually think this is one issue that is okay to be a single issue voter on, because once it’s achieved then all voting afterwards will be fairer.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 days ago

        i mean, i would disagree, but i see what you’re pushing for here.

        This is an issue that exceeds the importance of almost all other issues, aside from like, the immediate danger that electing trump would have.

        you should still vote, but push really hard for voting reform, shit’s important.

        • LustyArgonianMana
          link
          English
          14 days ago

          Yeah exactly, I was being a bit hyperbolic there but I do think this is a unifying issue for pretty much anyone from any party.

          Funny enough the other thing that really gets people under 50 going is talking about high speed rail done well and effectively here as public transportation. Something conservative men really like about trains lol, I’ll take it

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 days ago

            Yeah exactly, I was being a bit hyperbolic there but I do think this is a unifying issue for pretty much anyone from any party.

            that is true, as far as a unification tactic, both voting reform and certain public ventures would be highly effective, we should definitely setup bipartisan organizations for these things.

            • LustyArgonianMana
              link
              English
              22 days ago

              Agree :) Make government for the people, not for 2 specific political groups

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                221 hours ago

                yeah, that would be the idea. Speaking of making it for the people, i’ve thought about removing campaigning, and just instituting a “campaign policy” mandate instead. Bit of a long shot, but maybe if we knew less about these people, and cared about them less, things would be less personable, which is probably good at the federal level.

                • LustyArgonianMana
                  link
                  English
                  221 hours ago

                  Yes, I am very curious to hear about ideas for campaign reform. Hard for me to imagine alternatives, for some reason

                  • KillingTimeItself
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    221 hours ago

                    that’s probably the money, and the sensibility talking, i like to imagine worlds in which really silly things happen though.

                    Wait no we live there.

          • @CheeseNoodle
            link
            English
            34 days ago

            UK resident here, beware of rich people offering you trains.