A woman in Austria has been found guilty of fatally infecting her neighbor with COVID-19 in 2021, her second pandemic-related conviction in a year, according to local media.

A woman in Austria was found guilty of fatally infecting her neighbor with COVID-19 in 2021, her second pandemic-related conviction in a year, according to local media. A judge sentenced the 54-year-old on Thursday to four months’ suspended imprisonment and an 800-euro fine ($886.75) for grossly negligent homicide.

The victim, who was also a cancer patient, died of pneumonia that was caused by the coronavirus, according to Austrian news agency APA. A virological report showed that the virus DNA matched both the deceased and the 54-year-old woman, proving that the defendant “almost 100 percent” transmitted it, an expert told the court.

“I feel sorry for you personally – I think that something like this has probably happened hundreds of times,” the judge said Thursday. “But you are unlucky that an expert has determined with almost absolute certainty that it was an infection that came from you.”

  • Flying SquidMEnglish
    140•3 days ago

    The most relevant part of the article, to me, has not been quoted:

    This week, the judge heard statements from the deceased’s family, who said there had been contact in a stairwell between the neighbors on Dec. 21, 2001 — when the defendant would already have known she had COVID-19. But she denied the meeting, saying she was too sick to get out of bed that day. She also said she believed she had bronchitis, which she typically gets every year.

    But the woman’s doctor told police that the defendant had tested positive with a rapid test and told him that she “certainly won’t let herself be locked up” after the result.

    Seems pretty open-and-shut to me. If she had something like drug-resistant TB, there would be no question here.

    • @Nurse_RobotEnglish
      70•3 days ago

      With that context, 4 months and $800 doesn’t feel like enough

    • fistac0rpse
      44•3 days ago

      Dec. 21, 2001 - do news sites no longer employ editors or proofreaders?

      • Drusas
        10•3 days ago

        They almost all stopped doing so some years back. As someone who used to want to be a copywriter, reading modern articles with all of their constant mistakes is very frustrating.

    • @breakingcupsEnglish
      13•3 days ago

      Huh, I’m surprised the doctor was allowed to comment on that.

      • @RedWeaselEnglish
        15•3 days ago

        Why? There a limits on health care privacy privilege. Also with regards to with attorneys as well.

        • @The_vEnglish
          6•3 days ago

          Medical privacy ends when the condition may cause detrimental effects to other people. It’s not that difficult of a concept to understand.

          Somebody who has epilepsy is not allowed to drive vehicles or fly a plane. They might have an episode while operating the vehicle and kill/injure others.

          Somebody with a confirmed deadly disease is not allowed to wander around spreading it to others. Their decisions to ignore quarantine restrictions will kill/injure others.

      • @stolyEnglish
        9•3 days ago

        Public health is a privacy exception.

      • Todd BonzalezEnglish
        -21•3 days ago

        Welcome to a world without medical privacy.

        In the USA this wouldn’t happen because we have HIPAA.

        We also used to have Roe v. Wade…