Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently made headlines for calling perennial Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein “predatory” and “not serious.” AOC is right.

Giving voters more choices is a good thing for democracy. But third-party politics isn’t performance art. It’s hard work — which Stein is not doing. As AOC observed: “[When] all you do is show up once every four years to speak to people who are justifiably pissed off, but you’re just showing up once every four years to do that, you’re not serious.”

To be clear: AOC was not critiquing third parties as a whole, or the idea that we need more choices in our democracy. In fact, AOC specifically cited the Working Families Party as an example of an effective third party. The organization I lead, MoveOn, supports their 365-day-a-year efforts to build power for a pro-voter, multi-party system. And I understand third parties’ power to activate voters hungry for alternatives: I myself volunteered for Ralph Nader in 2000, and that experience helped shape my lifelong commitment to people-first politics.


Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -12 months ago

    Absolutely nobody considering a vote for Jill Stein thinks she is going to win. This is a slice of the electorate that the dems haven’t won over yet, but could.

    • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
      link
      English
      122 months ago

      This is a slice of the electorate that the dems haven’t won over yet, but could.

      If we’re just repeating things, then I guess that’s what we’re doing.

      The spoiler effect is based on geometric proximity, not the quality of policy.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes, which is why I included the qualifier “quality” to my statement.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -12 months ago

        You seem to be saying that the voters are irrational. That may or not be the case, but it’s largely irrelevant to converting them.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          You seem to be saying that the voters are irrational.

          Some are, some aren’t. Either way, saying “just have better policy” is ignorant at best.

            • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
              link
              English
              22 months ago

              That’s not what I am saying though.

              If we want to actually change the DNC for the better, that means voting in their primaries and especially at the local level with a heavy preference (not seeking perfection) for truly leftist candidates.

              The DNC needs to be taken over. Nagging will never do anything.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                02 months ago

                We’ve been trying that for decades, buddy. Dissatisfaction with the dems is not “seeking perfection”, “nagging”, or any other patronizing mischaracterization you wish to paint it as.

                • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
                  link
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  If you’ve been trying to take over the DNC for decades, how you’re doing that could use some work.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -12 months ago

                    And your strategy of voting for them no matter what their policy is works very well, I suppose?