@[email protected] to Lemmy Shitpost • 5 months agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square238fedilinkarrow-up11.61Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.org@[email protected] to Lemmy Shitpost • 5 months agomessage-square238fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink157•5 months agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-square@Kiwi_fellalink41•5 months agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•5 months agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-square@moduslink4•5 months agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)