• streetlights
    link
    -62 months ago

    I mean I’m not doubting the minister is a bit of a homophobe but I don’t think it’s wrong to focus aid on the disabled.

    • @Warl0k3
      link
      17
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s more about, in this case, how he’s openly sexist since that’s what this alliance seems to be against. But either way that’s a classic false binary. There’s no reason they cant provide aid for both groups at the same time, it doesn’t take away from either group to do that. This wasn’t even much additional funding, it was a policy oversight thing who’s stated goal decidedly wasn’t “care more about women than disabled people”.

      • streetlights
        link
        -52 months ago

        That’s true I suppose. His motivation does not appear to be altruistic but if it was a case of diverting limited funds, I can see his excuse not to fund this being reasonable.

        • @Warl0k3
          link
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Oh good, so you agree that his excuse is unreasonable then! I’m glad we had this little discussion.

          • streetlights
            link
            42 months ago

            Yes, thank you for the polite discourse.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          12 months ago

          I can see his excuse not to fund this being reasonable.

          “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” -MayaAngelou

          I believe you.