• @FlexibleToast
    link
    -14 hours ago

    No, that commenter literally said they’re not a threat and then gave the exact reason the green party is a threat to democrats.

      • @FlexibleToast
        link
        13 hours ago

        Are you saying that something helping the republicans isn’t a threat to democrats? Or are you saying it’s not enough to help because you’ve already forgotten the lesson from 2000?

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          12 hours ago

          No… I’m saying you’re mistaking two different commenters as one

          • @FlexibleToast
            link
            01 hour ago

            No… Because I’m only referring to one post.

            He’s wrong anyway, the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties, but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans.

            I’ll break it down for you. The first part of the post literally says this:

            the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties

            And then the very next part of the same sentence is:

            but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans

            Which is exactly what I pointed out. It starts by saying the green party isn’t a threat and then gives the exact reason why it is a threat.

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              11 hour ago

              Dude chill out it was a misunderstanding, apparently

    • Cadeillac
      link
      English
      24 hours ago

      A threat is viable. They are not