seahorse [Ohio]M to [email protected]English • 3 months agoI'm sure the women will be so very sadmidwest.socialimagemessage-square272fedilinkarrow-up1549arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1521arrow-down1imageI'm sure the women will be so very sadmidwest.socialseahorse [Ohio]M to [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square272fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@MutilationWavelink2•3 months agoShould of is so much worse though. There/they’re/their I can excuse as being dyslexic or English as a second language. But should of/could of speaks to a deep problem. The person who types it does not consider what they say.
minus-squarestebolinkfedilink1•3 months agoWhy? What’s the difference? In both cases a word is replaced by a similarly sounding word. Both mistakes are the same.
Should of is so much worse though. There/they’re/their I can excuse as being dyslexic or English as a second language. But should of/could of speaks to a deep problem. The person who types it does not consider what they say.
Why? What’s the difference? In both cases a word is replaced by a similarly sounding word. Both mistakes are the same.