• @MutilationWave
    link
    English
    773 months ago

    Made it to a doctorate without understanding that all people everywhere remember and understand things differently.

    Four people are in a car that mildly crashed on an icy road. Ask them independently, after a week, to tell the story of what happened.

    • @moistclump
      link
      English
      423 months ago

      PhD people aren’t known for their understanding of social situations.

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        143 months ago

        it clearly is, and that’s not why hearsay is inadmissible anyway.

        it’s inadmissible because it can’t be cross examined.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          I think they mean eyewitness testimony. eyewitness testimony is not actually worth anything because people don’t remember things properly and often the brain will make shit up just to fill in the blanks—especially when it matters. I was crossing an intersection once and was five paces away from a serious car accident and I couldn’t even remember which car was coming from which direction. wild.

          • @pyre
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            that’s another thing, and partly what cross examination is for, but eyewitness testimony is not inadmissible. in fact many trials have relied on a single eyewitness testimony, and whether the jury believes the witness or not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I don’t know what a good question to ask is but you seem like you have more interesting things to share on this topic. Would you care to elaborate further?

      • @MutilationWave
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        Nah not really just banging on the point that eyewitness testimony can be garbage because of the way our brains work.